You are suggesting that there is a Brahman on one side which can be known through transcendental knowledge and on the other side is everything else like ego, mind, senses... etc. What kind of Brahman is that which doesn't include everything and can not be the object of gross perception? Seems you fall in trap of dualism...
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of Mahrishi's apaurus... Zoran Krneta
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of Mahrishi's ap... Peter
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of Mahrishi's ap... Richard J. Williams
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of Mahrishi's apauru... Richard J. Williams
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of Mahrishi'... Zoran Krneta
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of Mahrishi'... Richard J. Williams
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of M... Zoran Krneta
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of ... Richard J. Williams
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vali... Zoran Krneta
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of Mahrishi's apauru... cardemaister