--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <sandiego108@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" > <sandiego108@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 22, 2008, at 12:53 AM, Robert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > "To the best of my knowledge, it has never been studied > > > truly > > > > > > > independently," said Dr. Herbert Benson, director > emeritus > > > of the > > > > > > > Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine at > > > Massachusetts > > > > > > > General Hospital, and a TM practitioner himself. "It's > been > > > > > > > hypothesized for many years, but never proven." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. We won't hold our breaths... > > > > > > > > > > > especially those of us with dualistic views. > > > > > > > > > > > > sandiego108 [aka Jim Flanegan] apparently supports 'bait and > > > switch' > > > > world peace. The kind he foresees is when everyone turns into > > > > obnoxious zombie non-persons like him who actually do zilch > about > > > > anything in the real world. Wars, poverty, human suffering of > all > > > > manner keep happening but it no longer matters to freaks like > him > > > who > > > > live in an alternate invincible reality of imaginary invincible > > > > kingdoms in imaginary invincible countries. > > > > > > > i know-- if he'd *only* change, *i'd* be a lot happier and the > world > > > would be a *much* better place for all of us. bastard. > > > > > > Typical bullshit 'avoid-the-issue' non-answer from our local > > self-proclaimed 'enlightened' guy. > > > John, I can appreciate that you like a tidy universe where everyone > makes the same assumptions as you do, and those that don't are > wrong. But that is a tad too fundamentalist for my liking, and my > experience, so I won't be spending my time here engaging you in a > meaningless argument about who is right and who is wrong in this > situation. > > I am perfectly OK with you dreaming whatever dream you wish to, and > I will continue to do the same. If you continue to insist that I > conform to your assumptions, however rational and true they seem for > you, then I would ask that you please go fuck yourself. I'm done. > Thanks.
Finally a sane voice :-)
