It is beyond question that Brahman does not exist, especially if existence is seen as the source of reality and if Western empiricism is the determining factor in deciding a question like this. None of that means, however, that Brahman is not real.
--- Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Since the nervous system is a 'reflector' of the > one Brahman or pure > > consciousness, and birds do not have a full > compliment of chakras, > > their nervous systems would not be able to fully > reflect pure > > consciousness or achieve Samadhi. > > > > Man is unique in this respect, his > causal/astral/physical nervous > > system contains all of the elements (7 chakras) > necessary to fully > > reflect Being ultimately becoming one with > it...."and man was made in > > the image of God". > > -----There is no God. What there is is empty > clarity. All things reflect > this as none of them are established in any way. > Thus there is no thing > which is more nor less Brahman. There is no Brahman. > There never was a > Brahman. There never will be a Brahman. There is > nothing which stays forever > the same. Anything which could stay forever the same > has not done so, so > why? Because there is nothing which serves as a > basis for something to stay > the same. Thus nothing is established as permanent. > Thus your system of > chakras is inept and does not serve the cause of > truth as either a parable > nor as a foundation for awakening, nor as something > of vital essence for > liberation. There is only empty clarity at the root > of all, and even that is > merely a view or standpoint. There is no vital body > of three or seven or 14 > or ten or twenty spheres, nor a body of sheaths, nor > deities to channel, not > gods to inhabit the heavens. Nothing has been > established. So if my parrots > wish to stay in samadhi, that's their doing, and > they are no less ept nor > inept for your parroting bogus teachings of no > value. > > The only good chakra is the one which rolls and does > work. Work is mass > times acceleration over a distance. A wheel which > doesn't accelerate, which > has no mass, and which goes no distance does no > work, thus it's pointless. > Both literally, figuratively, and in all ways. If it > goes nowhere then what > sort of wheel is it? If there is nowhere to go then > what sort of teaching is > it? Neither you nor anyone else will ever prove the > existance of Brahman, > because Brahman has never been established as > something. > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
