--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2008, at 12:24 PM, do.rflex wrote:
> 
> >
> >     STEPHANOPOULOS [Clinton/Obama Debate]: Senator, two questions.  
> > Number one, do you think Reverend Wright loves America as much as  
> > you do?
> >
> > Not only is this a prime example of the facile, despicable  
> > questions asked at last night's assault on the whole idea of a  
> > presidential debate, it's really not fair.
> 
> That whole debate was a sick joke, and provides yet more
> evidence of why so many Americans tune the whole
>   thing out.
> 
> Sal


The left blogoshpere says pretty much the same, Sal. It was indeed
shameful. 


TPM: Looking around other sites, I guess I'm not the only one that
thought this debate was unmitigated travesty. Maybe the embargo on
debate rebroadcast was a pro-human rights stand.


>From FDL: Well, that was really, really horrible. Charlie Gibson and
Mr. Snuffalupagus fed Clinton and Obama nothing but gotcha questions.
Torture never came up, China never came up, unchecked executive power
never came up, and it was 50+ minutes in before they asked any
questions that could be considered remotely substantive or issues-based.


Atrios: Aside from the lack of policy questions, so far this "debate"
has been played entirely on wingnut ground. If BillO and Sean Hannity
hosted it the questions would've been the same. In a general election
debate it would make sense to get questions from the right like that,
but in a democratic primary it's just fucking stupid.


DKos: The questioning in tonight's debate--—mostly straight out of
1988—was an abomination. Gun control. 60's radicalism. Inflammatory
black pastors. Respecting or disrespecting the flag. Taxes. Being out
of touch with the military. Affirmative Action. I'll bet if they had
more time, ABC anchors Charles Gibson and George Stephanopolus would
probably have gotten around to asking Obama and Clinton about Willie
Horton and Piss Christ.


Editor & Publisher: In perhaps the most embarrassing performance by
the media in a major presidential debate in years, ABC News hosts
Charles Gibson and George Stephanopolous focused mainly on trivial
issues as Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama faced off in Philadelphia.


OpenLeft: Halfway through the debate, not a single question on any
policy issue had been asked, it was obvious that this debate was
prime-time hit job on Obama. The questions so far have been why he
doesn't wear a flag pin, whether or not his pastor loves America, why
he can't win, and how many people were offended by his bittergate
comments. 

Except for Clinton being asked about why she wasn't trustworthy, and
both of them being asked about their vice-presidential choices, that
has been the entire debate. As Master Jack said in the comments,
nothing on Iraq, nothing on the economy, nothing on health care,
nothing on housing, nothing on global warming, nothing on torture.
This is nothing but a prime-time hit job on Democrats, although mainly
a hit job on Obama.


Tapped: Seriously "does rev. wright love america as much as you?"
Really? REALLY?!!! Also, "what will you do when clips" of Wright "play
over an over" on TV? [... A woman asks if Obama "believes in the
American flag" because he doesn't wear a flag pin. Charlie Gibson says
that questions about the flag are "all over the internet" -- along
with Pamela Anderson's sex tape, cats with bad grammar, and Rick
Astley. Journalism at it's finest.


Huff Post: Why in the world George Stephanopoulos felt compelled to
ask Barack Obama if Reverend Wright "loved America" after he had
already been made to give another recitation of his repudiation of
Wright's remarks is a question that simply defies the imagination. 

What sort of sensible answer can be given to that question? It would
require astral projection to properly gauge another man's emotional
state. And if you want to ask Hillary Clinton to account for the odd
contortions she advanced on the matter of her Bosnia recollections,
just sack up and ask. Don't hide behind the additional, pointless
cruelty of a random voter's scoldings that Clinton lost their vote. 

What a wholly superfluous pile on! And the flag lapel pin question
came with this admonishment from Charles Gibson: "It keeps coming up,
again and again." Well, no shit, Charlie! It keeps "coming up, again
and again" because the media resolutely refuses to obtain the
necessary courage to stop doing so.

Links here - Americablog: http://tinyurl.com/6s3c4b




Reply via email to