Agreed. Makes me wish I hadn't written my earlier message.
Piling on is a drag. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Nice recovery Edg.
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > Sgrayatlarge, 
> > 
> > I sincerely apologize for suggesting that you are a pro-war poster.  I
> > was entirely wrong -- I was flat out wrong.  I beg your forgiveness,
> > and I hope my other posts here will have convinced you that I was
> > doing one of my "shoot from the hip at 120 words per minute" thingies,
> > and that we probably see eye to eye on humanitarian issues.  As a
> > punishment, if you desire, I will refrain from posting here for any
> > amount of time you decree -- even banning me forever.  I simply fucked
> > up big time, and if I'm willing to ban the War Monger, surely, I must
> > be subject to the same verdict if you see fit.  I have deleted the
> > offensive post as a very small token.
> > 
> > Edg
> > 
> > "curtisdeltablues" wrote:> "Aside from the fact that Steve is a great
> > guy who doesn't deserve a tirade...This perspective on terrorism is a
> > myth.  None of the 9-11 hijackers were poor.  I'm all for human aid to
> > poor countries but trying to link this to the war on terror has been
> > proven to be bogus."
> > 
> > Curtis,
> > 
> > I just now reread all of sgrayatlarge's last twenty posts, and 
> > 
> > I WAS WRONG.  Don't know why I got him confused with other War Mongers
> > here, but I did -- his post had something smarmy and I took it as a
> > willingness to bomb Iran.  Some days, I'm like this, and GAWD GAWD
> GAWD.  
> > 
> > If Sgrayatlarge bans me, nice knowing ya, folks!
> > 
> > Edg
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > no
> > > > child IN THE ENTIRE WORLD dies because of dirty water, bad
> nutrition,
> > > > etc.  Only with such measures can we ever hope to mend the
> fences and
> > > > let the dark memories fade over the decades.  
> > > > 
> > > > Failing this, the third world will continue to produce
> > > > terrorists....and thus the war profiteers will have their windfall
> > > > profits.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Edg,
> > > 
> > > Aside from the fact that Steve is a great guy who doesn't deserve a
> > > tirade...
> > > 
> > > This perspective on terrorism is a myth.  None of the 9-11 hijackers
> > > were poor.  I'm all for human aid to poor countries but trying to link
> > > this to the war on terror has been proven to be bogus.    
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sgrayatlarge,
> > > > 
> > > > You've been posting way too many supportive-to-war pieces here
> lately,
> > > > so yeah, I'm thinking you're a murder loving creep like Shemp
> and the
> > > > War Monger.  
> > > > 
> > > > Tell us all plainly: do you discount the carnage on children and
> > > > innocents like FFL's resident War Monger does -- is such carnage
> > > > acceptable to you for the imagined political gains?  Would you cheer
> > > > if Hillary nukes Iran?
> > > > 
> > > > Iran's leaders say what has to be said in order to keep their
> jobs --
> > > > to spotlight them personally is entirely missing the point.
> > > > 
> > > > It is the will of Iran's people that keeps their leaders
> employed, and
> > > > what the War Monger, and you too it seems, are ignoring is the
> ENTIRE
> > > > HISTORY OF THE WESTERN POWERS ABUSING THE ISLAMIC CULTURE, and how
> > > > that has created the very mindset we see today.  Tell us,
> > > > Sgrayatlarge, what would you do if Canada had nukes and America
> didn't
> > > > and regularly the Canadians bombed our nuke research facilities
> which
> > > > killed your child in collateral damage?  What would you do if Canada
> > > > simply declared that California and Oregon and Washington were
> to be a
> > > > new country run by a militarily imposed de facto dictatorship?
> > > > 
> > > > I'm no lover of burkas etc., in fact, of all the major religions, I
> > > > find Islam to be the one that most disgusts me, but I find every
> > > > religion generally to be immorally power-seeking, but to ignore what
> > > > has been done in the past to alienate the Muslim nations is to
> be, in
> > > > fact, a collaborationist for BigBiz.
> > > > 
> > > > War itself must be demonized, and that means that only extraordinary
> > > > peace-supporting efforts would do when it comes to international
> > > > politics.  An example of extraordinary effort would be: making
> sure no
> > > > child IN THE ENTIRE WORLD dies because of dirty water, bad
> nutrition,
> > > > etc.  Only with such measures can we ever hope to mend the
> fences and
> > > > let the dark memories fade over the decades.  
> > > > 
> > > > Failing this, the third world will continue to produce
> > > > terrorists....and thus the war profiteers will have their windfall
> > > > profits.
> > > > 
> > > > How you respond to this post is critical in that you're either
> part of
> > > > the problem or part of the solution.  Do you have the guts to
> plainly
> > > > tell us that killing children for oil doesn't bother you?
> > > > 
> > > > Edg
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sgrayatlarge <no_reply@>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh right, that big campaign by the neocons and you know what
> > > > > their is no homosexual problem in Iran either.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks for setting the record straight on that great guy
> > > > > who really needs a shave
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <no_reply@> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sgrayatlarge <no_reply@> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Defending Ahmadinejad...
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Classy
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > **********
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Just as there was a mendacious campaign by neocons to get the 
> > > > > country 
> > > > > > behind the war with Iraq, there has been an attempt to demonize 
> > > > > > Ahmadinejad by those same neocon elements, in order to justify 
> > > > > > another war in the Middle East. Think the scheeple are stupid 
> > > > > enough 
> > > > > > to buy this? Personally, I'll pass.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <no_reply@> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
> > > > > > <shempmcgurk@> 
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"
> <feste37@> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This discussion is so twisted in its logic. Iran
> does not 
> > > > > > have 
> > > > > > > > > nuclear
> > > > > > > > > > weapons. Israel does. So why are people creating
> > fictional 
> > > > > > > > scenarios
> > > > > > > > > > of Iran nuking Israel?
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 1) Because all indications are that, like North Korea
> > before 
> > > > > > > them, 
> > > > > > > > as 
> > > > > > > > > they are with full speed ahead enriching uranium and only 
> > > > > > > claiming 
> > > > > > > > it 
> > > > > > > > > is for use in generating electricity that, in reality,
> they 
> > > > > are 
> > > > > > > > doing 
> > > > > > > > > it to make nuclear bombs; and
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 2) Because, time and time and yet time again, the elected 
> > > > > > > > > representative of the Iranians, Mr. Ahmedehejad, has said 
> > > > > that 
> > > > > > > > Israel 
> > > > > > > > > will be wiped off the map.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > ***********
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Ahmadinejad did not say that he was going to destroy
> > Israel -- 
> > > > > > the 
> > > > > > > > more reasonable translation of what he was saying was that
> > the 
> > > > > > name 
> > > > > > > > of Israel is not going to be on future maps of the Middle 
> > > > > East, 
> > > > > > and 
> > > > > > > > I'm quite sure that will happen within a generation or two:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad_and_Israel
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > It's the ultimate hypocrisy for the U.S. to OK Israel's 
> > > > > enormous 
> > > > > > > > cache of nuclear weapons while insisting that other
> countries 
> > > > > do 
> > > > > > > not 
> > > > > > > > have the same right to WMD to assert their national
> > interests, 
> > > > > > and 
> > > > > > > as 
> > > > > > > > noted in another post, the U.S. has had to back down on
> this 
> > > > > > > > untenable position:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > "VIENNA (AP) — Facing international opposition, U.S. 
> > > > > negotiators 
> > > > > > at 
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > nuclear meeting have dropped their insistence on a ban
> on the 
> > > > > > > transfer
> > > > > > > > of uranium enrichment technology to non-nuclear states, 
> > > > > diplomats 
> > > > > > > said
> > > > > > > > Tuesday.
> > > > > > > > The compromise, which moves American closer to the
> positions 
> > > > > of 
> > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > nations selling nuclear technology and material, is
> important 
> > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > it could give ammunition to Iran, which is under U.N. 
> > > > > sanctions 
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > defying a Security Council demand that it give up its 
> > > > > enrichment
> > > > > > > > program.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > (more) http://tinyurl.com/4c78tk
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to