--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > > > wrote: > > <snip> > > > > I'm baaaaack! > > > > > > And you are welcome baaaaack, partly because > > > even though you almost certainly went over the > > > posting limit last week by accident, you took > > > your timeout quietly, without fuss, and with > > > class. > > > > > > Compare and contrast to some who, in the class > > > department, have shown...uh...not so much. > > > > ROTFL! > > > > I've never made a fuss about a timeout. I was > > never *given* a timeout to make a fuss about. > > > > Barry has also claimed that I "refused" to take > > a timeout, even though (a) I've never been > > given one, and (b) there's no "refusal" option > > for timeouts. > > > > Barry lives a life of solipsistic fantasy > > because reality doesn't work quite the way he > > thinks it should. > > > > And, oh, if you want to see "class," check out > > a few of Barry's posts ranting about my posting > > habits, based on the obsessive count he keeps > > of the number of my posts. > > > > Sick, and getting sicker by the day. > > Gee, Judy...I was talking about Shemp and Nabby > and sparaig, all of whom have thrown tantrums > over being tossed off for a week or more. > > Did you somehow think I was talking about you? > Must be a guilty conscience. > > And the lack of class thing, of course... :-) > > But now that you bring it up (I didn't) You *have* > gone over the posting limit more than anyone here. > That is documented, both before the enforced timeouts, > and afterwards. And you have even *admitted* that you > went over, and yet never once did you *voluntarily* > take your well-deserved timeout. > > I'd say that speaks to a certain lack of class, > wouldn't you? >
I disagree TurquoiseB. She exemplifies *Third* class.
