--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <richardhughes103@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > <snip> > > > Gee, it's lucky you found something right at the > > > beginning you could quibble with (even though you > > > don't offer any rebuttal), so you could stop reading > > > and avoid dealing with all the other information. > > > > > > I'm going to restore the parts you snipped from that > > > first section so we have a fuller story: > > > > They don't add anything, the principle part is that this > > guy thinks the CIA cover up the realitty of crop circles. > > Yes, it adds the fact that there's *documentation* > that this has been going on; it's not just paranoid > imagining. Those are the parts you carefully snipped, > interestingly enough. > > It also adds more details about Doug and Dave that > call their credibility in question (not just with > regard to the notion that they were cooperating in > a government debunking effort). > > > It's lame Judy, lame. > > Translation: I can't debunk it, so I'll just call it lame > and hope that does the trick. > > > I thought the rest was crap too BTW, kind of a sub-saucer > > magazine for the true believers. The government denies it! > > It must be true! > > I think you're annoyed because it shows so many of > your objections to be smartass rather than thoughtful. > > Nowhere does it suggest that because the government > denies it, therefore it must be true. Rather, it > gives many details of why the circles aren't so easily > explained away. > > And it's stuff the "true believers" know already, so it > wasn't written for them at all. This is for people who > want to know more about the issues and the facts (in > other words, *genuine* skeptics, not skeptopaths like > yourself). > > > > > I think this article is typical of the rubbish you find on > > > > the net > > > > > > But unfortunately you will be unable to take the > > > time to debunk any of it for us, right? > > > > The CIA stop paying me at 6pm so I would have to do it > > on my own time. > > > > > And I'd guess you didn't even look at the second > > > article. > > > > Didn't notice a link, but I won't if you think it's > > as "good" as that one. > > You could always go back and find the link I gave, of > course, but I'm not surprised you won't. You are > really not interested in exploring this; you just like > to sound off.
Ha!
