--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> shempmcgurk wrote:
> >
> > But, Bhairitu, the issue you brought up was throwing people who 
> > commit contempt of Congress in jail, which you are eager to do, 
and 
> > you cite quite specifically the procedure under law in which the 
> > Capital Hill Police can do that to Rove.
> >
> > The Hollywood Ten -- whether you may thing them to be right or 
wrong 
> > or whether you sympathize with their politics -- were held in 
> > contempt of Congress and, as a result, jailed.  In fact, they 
> > appealed the conviction and brought the case to the Supreme Court 
and 
> > they lost.
> >
> > So it is not an issue of whether you like or dislike Joe McCarthy 
or 
> > like or dislike Karl Rove but of the breaking of laws and the 
jailing 
> > of those that break those laws.
> >
> > Again, I ask you a second time: to be consistent with your 
original 
> > argument, do you or do you not support the jailing of the 
Hollywood 
> > Ten?
> No.  There's quite a difference between the Hollywood Ten who hurt 
no 
> one


Well, neither did Julius and Ethel Rosenberg "hurt no one", Bhairitu, 
when they passed secrets of the atomic bomb to the Soviets but they 
were executed for their crimes all the same.

The Hollywood Ten didn't commit any crimes that we know of vis a vis 
their involvement in the Community Party but they did break the law 
by not cooperating with Congresss.  And I suppose, like the 
Rosenbergs, they "hurt no one" by being members of the Communist 
Party.  Of course, as a result of the opening up of the Sovit 
Archives since the fall of Communism, we now know that this the US 
Communist Party was committed to the illegal overthrow of the United 
States Government and was controlled not by party members but by a 
foreign entity (i.e., Joseph Stalin).  And I suppose this 
activity "hurt no one" according to you, Bhairitu, but break the law 
they did by refusing to cooperate with Congress and into prison they 
deserved to go.









> and the criminal activities of Rove.  Obviously to anyone with a 
> brain back in the 1950's the Hollywood Ten was protesting 
McCarthy's 
> ridiculous hearing by not showing up.  They didn't break any laws 
like 
> Rove did.  In Rove's case I'll stand behind Congress on it.  They 
have 
> the goods on his crimes which must be brought to trial.  All Rove 
is 
> doing is running like the fat little coward he is.  Plus Congress 
just 
> got more teeth:
> 
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Federal_judge_rules_Bush_aides_can_0731.
html
> 
> Apparently you are a big fan of corruption in government, 
Shempozilla.
>


Reply via email to