--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Americans are recognizing that Obama is a phenomenon in > > > > American politics. If there are many racists in the Democratic > > > > Party, Obama wouldn't have gotten this far in the nominating > > > > process. > > > > > > > > IMO, there's a surging consciousness in the USA for a change > > > > from the present Republican administration, and it just happens > > > > to be Obama who is the best one among the Democrats to > > > > challenge the Republicans. > > > > > > Whether he succeeds or fails. > > > > > > It's the clash of energies that is important. > > > > In other words, it's the fluctuation of the gunas, in vedic terms. > > No, not at all. Energy -- and the universe composed > of it -- is far more interesting and complex than > the dumbed-down triumverate of energies postulated > by "Vedic" philosophers. > > You're falling for the good/evil dualistic dichotomy. > I'm talking about an energy signature which is neither > good nor evil on either side, because 1) such simplis- > tic distinctions don't exist, and because 2) all beings > are a complex *mix* of energies of all sorts.
Well, we would have to wait until the spring of 2009 to find out about the truth of the energies you're talking about. That's the time frame that the giant collider in Switzerland will be fixed to continue its research on subatomic particles. But I'm not sure if the energies you are referring to can be verified by science. IMO, they should be. > It also has nothing to do with "evolution" and who > is more "evolved" or any simplistic horseshit like > that. Barry et al, The Shrimad Bhagavatam mentions in many occasions that living entities are hung up on experiencing the senses that they are willing to take rebirth as different life forms on this earth or on other planets throughout the universe, or possibly in other universes. In this context, evolution is infinitely relevant. It's just that Obama's energy mix is more intelli- > gent than McCain's, by a long shot. That provides > people with an opportunity to see which energy they > identify with more -- intelligence or idiocy. > > The fact that the polls (even though they are being > manipulated) are so close indicates that Americans > are torn on this subject. Since most Americans are fairly well educated compared to world standard, one would think that this would be an easy choice. Most people here in the USA would only understand the arguments when their loved ones are killed in some faroff countries, and when their pockets are burned by layoffs and loss of savings/investments due to an economic downturn, such as the current financial crisis in Wall Street. > > > > Let's find out who they are by the response that you get. > > You mean like a homosexual calling a straight guy a homo- > sexual and thinking that it's an insult? :-) > > THAT is what I'm talking about with regard to the clash > of energies. It's not a good vs. evil thang; it's an > intelligence vs. stupidity thang. No one who is the > least bit intelligent (or sane) is going to go around > insulting other people by insinuating that they're > *just like them*. Humans are an odd lot. Anything can happen. There are priests who enter the service of the church/ashram and preach about the accepted doctrines. Yet at the same time, some of these priests molest children and have sex with their parishioners.
