I find it real peculiar that with the Householders Mantras, people 
try to live in celebacy and be a recluse. It does not make sense to 
me. If you meditate with a Householders Mantra, then you should be 
very active in society, otherwise it will cause stress. In the 
earlier days young people were practising Transcendental Meditation 
for hours, dreaming of some life as a recluse in Himalayas. I knew 
some of them - and some got very heavy mental problems and some did 
suicide. We were not told the difference between Householders Mantras 
and Mantras given for recluse life. The fact is that we were not told 
anything at all. In 1962, I got the Mantra one day, and the teacher 
checked the mantra the day after and then left. The next time I saw 
her, was 20 years after. But most of us continued to meditate. That 
was the days where we were allowed to practice long meditations - .I 
once meditated in 12 hours - and came out quite dizzy, it was rather 
dangerous. So in the beginning of the Movement it seems that MMY and 
we were learning by doing. "The strongest survived."
Ingegerd

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Llundrub wrote:
> 
> >Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
> >
> >
> >on 6/20/05 10:05 AM, Llundrub at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> >  Yes, just OM! 
> >
> >
> >So I wonder whether meditating on OM by itself might make one a 
recluse while meditating with a longer mantra that contains OM might 
not, as my friend suggested in the comment I posted here yesterday. 
> >
> >I have a basic problem with these generalizations based on 
heresay.  
> >
> >For the basic reason that when I used to do TM at MIU I wanted to 
be a recluse and escape from all the cares of the world, and that was 
using my non-OM mantra. So I can only imagine if what Maharishi says 
about OM is true that I would have probably wanted to run screaming 
from samsara. Moreover, my desires had no support at MIU and I was 
miserable.   
> >
> >So I ask, what is the real difference?  
> >
> >My experience, which I consider to be the only important thing in 
the world, confirms for me that the mantras which I have used since 
TM, most of which contain OM as a part are extremely effective in 
very vaulable ways, and they have only bettered my life.  
> >
> >When I used to do Mahalakshmi Sadhana I used two main mantras 
which together are:
> >Om shrim klim mahalakshmiyei namaha Om shrim hrim shrim kamala 
kamalalayei praseed praseed shrim hrim shrim om mahalakshmiyei 
namaha.  Many Oms, I had much benefit from doing this 250,000 times. 
> >
> >  
> >
> <snip>
> If you have a "guru mantra" then the amount of repetitions required 
to 
> attain mantra siddhi are significantly reduced.  It's also 
interesting 
> to note that the "secret" mantras are often much shorter. :)




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to