--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 9, 2008, at 8:59 PM, The Secret wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <fflmod@> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> There was a comment by Bevan posted maybe a week ago. Try searching > > on his name. > >> > > > > Thanks. My oh my. Deja vu all over again. A major real estate > > developer in Vedic City told me about the phase transition in the > > economy about 5-6 weeks ago. I just passed it off as this man's > > peculiar characteristic Area 51 outlook on world affairs and the TMO. > > Now I'm wondering whether or not I was getting a preview of the to be > > announced party line. > > > > I am still confused, however. Now we have yet another rule added to > > the Maharishi Effect: that the stock market goes up when the numbers > > go up unless the numbers cause a phase transition, during which the > > world finally recognizes that we alone had the truth all this time. > > > > I wonder if the accountants have bothered to look at the assets of the > > TMO. Real Estate prices are tanking worldwide. And the TMO has its > > wealth in real estate. > > > It's just a rehash and spin of the old "unstressing" story, spun for > the masses. That way when the numbers are at their highest in the > domes in years (decades?) they can blame it on "purification"--and > try to divert attention away from the fact that pacification, > enrichment and control aren't actual qualities of TM, the TMSP or > really any relaxation style meditation technique. But they are what > would be necessary if they were actual tantrics. It's important to > cover the ME lie with spin as it reduces the cognitive dissonance for > the followers. >
Interesting. I assume that "pacification" was meant to be "purification?" And of course, you're just asserting this stuff and have less evidence that TM theory is wrong than the TM theorists have that it is right. Lawson
