--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ From Newsweek, via HuffPost. Note that the > first (greeting staffers wearing only a towel) > is probably why she was picked in the first > place...Republicans are too uptight to go out > and buy porn, so they're hoping for a glimpse > of nudity closer to home. :-) Also note the > timing of the second point, that Sarah Palin > initiated the Obama-linked-to-Ayers attack on > her own, "going rogue" before the camp author- > ized her to do so, exactly as I said, and was > pooh-poohed for saying here.
Goodness gracious me, Barry is lying. Quel surprise! Even more surprising, he's told the same lie before, and been corrected on it then. No, that isn't what Barry was pooh-poohed for saying. He was pooh-poohed for citing as the first sign she was going rogue her use of the smear that Obama had criticized U.S. troops for bombing civilians in Afghanistan (when what he'd actually been criticizing was the lack of troops to carry out ground operations). According to Barry, this was something she'd come up with on her own after perusing anti-Obama Web sites, an "old crapola smear" not even the McCain campaign would have approved of her using. In fact, it was a smear the McCain campaign had revived in a press release just six weeks previously. It wasn't Palin going rogue in that instance, it was Palin citing a McCain talking point. This information, BTW, was in the very article Barry cited as support for his thesis. He just hadn't bothered to read it to the end. Bottom line: Barry goofed. And not only has he never acknowledged his error, he's *lied* about it in two different posts, using it in an attempt to smear the person who corrected him.