Lurk, I think you're right . . .
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Feste, it sounds like you are going through serious post election
> withdrawal. Already looking ahead to 2012, and pontificating.
> Playing up this "palling around with terroists" as though it's
> beyond the pale of typical campagin rhetoric. Believe me, if not
> this quote, you'd find another to create good 'ol "righteous
> indignation" Try walking around your living room and work off some
> of this monologuing. Oh, and maybe focus on the present, and see how
> Obama handles the current challenges.
>
> You have placed him on such a pedestal. Tell me how he is not going
> to disappoint numerous supporters. Sounds like Sarah Palin is going
> to play the role for you that the Clintons have played for Rush
> Limbaugh. Whatever Barack does, you'll be complaining about Palin.
>
>
> -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <drpetersutphen@>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I'd really be shocked if the conservative base supported her.
> > Shocked and disappointed. What's happening to her now is really
> awful
> > with the anonymous attacks. I hope she doesn't do a tit-for-tat
> with
> > Van Sustern on Monday.That would be a bloodbath.
> >
> > Sarah deserves all she gets. I cannot forgive her remark, made many
> > times, about Obama "palling around with terrorists." That was a
> > disgraceful comment and she should be ashamed of it. Not only was
> it
> > ridiculous and untrue, it was also dangerous and could have incited
> > someone to harm Obama. I read that the number of threats against
> Obama
> > is "huge," and Sarah Palin bears some responsibility. If due to
> some
> > self-destructive streak in the Republican Party she gets the 2012
> > nomination, I can confidently predict, right now, the result:
> Barack
> > 49 states, Sarah 1 (that's assuming she can even hold on to
> Alaska).
> >
>
