--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 11, 2008, at 2:25 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote: > > >> They *want* us to keep talking about them, but > >> why should we? Because some people can't stop > >> obsessing on them? That's their problem, not > >> mine. > > > > Dude, if this is an intervention then I'm gunna need a few weeks > > of Methadone before I go cold turkey on her. If anything she is > > much more fascinating now that the harm she could do is > > contained. I'll make sure my Palin obsessed posts are well > > labeled so you can avoid them! But I gotta have my Palin for a > > little longer. I'm trying to quit, but its gunna take some time. > > > > I do disagree that she has nothing to offer. Her entertainment > > value has a proven track record for me! Yeah, I'm deep like that. > > > It sounds to me like someone needs a Sarah Palin inflatable love > doll! It's sure to take those blues away! Come on! It's time to > cross those party lines! > > http://www.thefrisky.com/site/post/246-sarah-palin-sex-doll-now-on-sale/
I'm beginning to understand what Curtis means by "entertainment value." OK, I'll bite. :-) The thing is, I've heard that Sarah Palin hates this sex doll of her more than she hates Obama. The reason is that not only is it better in bed than she is, it gives better interview than she does.
