--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wonder why authfriend is posting this very minor news
> item.

It's the follow-up to one I posted earlier, actually.
That's why the first word in the post was "Followup,"
you see.

And it's actually not a "very minor news item," or it
wasn't after it was posted on Drudge. The newspaper
had to put it on a separate server because so many
people wanted to read it. It was very big on the blogs.

> I guess it's just an attempt to make Obama look bad

I don't believe Obama had anything to do with this. Or
do you know otherwise?

> but I fail to see how it does that.

Indeed. A little paranoid, are we?

 On another  matter, I'm intrigued at the speculation
> linking Hillary with the Secretary of State job and wondering
> how the bitter Hillaryites on this forum will react if Hill
> does NOT get the job.

There are big advantages and big disadvantages for both
Hillary and Obama in having her as SOS. I'm not at all
sure I wouldn't rather have her stay in the Senate and
work on domestic issues like the economy and health care.
On the other hand, Obama needs all the help he can get
with foreign policy.

I just hope the decision is made on the basis of what's
best for the country rather than the kind of petty
political grudges you seem to be fixated on.

FWIW, here's one political blogger making the case for
her as SOS:

Hillary as Secretary of State
November 14th, 2008
By: Michael van der Galien

According to several reports in American media, Senator 
Hillary Clinton could very well become the Secretary of 
State in the Obama administration which will take 
office in January 2009.

Team Obama was considering asking individuals like Sen. 
Chuck Hagel, Sen. John Kerry or Gov. Bill Richardson 
for the job but, media report say, the leaders of the 
transition were not too happy with those choices. 

Clinton would strategically be a very strong choice for 
president-elect Barack Obama indeed: It would help him 
heal the party tremendously. Furthermore, although 
Clinton lost she is still one of the most powerful 
Democratic leaders with a tremendous political machine 
operating for her. If Obama can tie her to himself, she 
will obviously help him four years from now.

Not only that, but Clinton is also a widely respected 
figure in the rest of the world. Until Obama proved he 
was a serious candidate for his party's nomination, 
Clinton was the favorite abroad, especially in Europe. 
People remember her husband's administration fondly. If 
you want to restore America's reputation among its 
allies, Clinton would be a very good choice for 
Secretary of State indeed.

http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/14/hillary-as-secretary-of-state/

http://tinyurl.com/66gcrg

Whatever she does, she's likely to make (not "be," as
some here would have it) history.


Reply via email to