--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard M" <compost1uk@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" > > <do.rflex@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" > > > > <do.rflex@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine > > > > > > > > <salsunshine@> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Maharishi Peace Palaces are looking to fill > > an > > > > > > > > Accommodation > > > > > > > > > > > > > manager/marketing position.This is a full- time > > > > > position but > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > flexible to > > > > > > > > > > > > > allow for one to participate in the Invincible > > > > America > > > > > > > > > > Assembly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hours would > > > > > > > > > > > > > be 1:00 - 4:30 and 8:00 - 9:00 6 days a week. > > > > > > > > Qualifications > > > > > > > > > > include > > > > > > > > > > > > > experience in sales, marketing, financial > > > > management, > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > > self - > > > > > > > > > > > > > organizer > > > > > > > > > > > > > with computer skills and customer service > > oriented > > > > manner. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~Remuneration would be accommodation in one > > bedroom > > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > Maharishi > > > > > > > > > > > > > Peace > > > > > > > > > > > > > Palace > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~$500 basic plus 4% of gross accommodation > > income > > > > per > > > > > month > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~Opportunity to enjoy a further $700 per month > > > > exits as > > > > > > > > hours > > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > been set > > > > > > > > > > > > > to accommodate the Invincible America Assembly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To set up an interview please send resumes to > > us at > > > > > > > > tmcenter@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:tmcenter@> . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone want to write up a "resume" and send it > > in? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > D > > > > > > > > > > > > Sal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Below poverty wages. That doesn't remotely meet the > > > > minimum > > > > > > > > wage. > > > > > > > > > > > Illegal immigrants make more. What a joke. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is not a defense of the TMO in this instance, > > Bongo > > > > > Brazil, > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > you're wrong when you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "That doesn't remotely meet the minimum wage." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, actually, it does: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Assume 30 days in a month, less 4 days off = 26 > > working > > > > days. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 26 working days times 4.5 hours of work a day = 117 > > hours > > > > total > > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > > > per month. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 117 hours times the future minimum wage (effective > > July > > > > 24, > > > > > 2009) > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > $7.25/hour = $848.25 mimimum wage for the month. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $848.25 less the $500.00 minimum they pay you = > > $348.25 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...and what is the reasonable market value of a room > > > > rented for > > > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > month in the Peaceful Palate? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know what the rental market is in Iowa but, > > gosh, > > > > I'd > > > > > > > > LOVE to > > > > > > > > > > pay less than $12.00 a day (which is what $348.25 > > divided > > > > by 30 > > > > > > > > days > > > > > > > > > > equals) for a room! The last hotel room I stayed in > > (in > > > > > > > > Baltimore at > > > > > > > > > > the Sheridan) was $200 a day! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And we haven't even factored in the 4% on top of > > > > everything > > > > > they > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > pay you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, I'm not a fan of the TMO or its slave- labor > > > > policies but > > > > > > > > it is > > > > > > > > > > certainly not what you suggest it is, Bongo. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's a total crap deal, Magoo, and you know it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you not read English? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are your reading skills as bad as your political > > positions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Read what I wrote above: "...its slave-labor policies" > > > > and "I'm > > > > > not a > > > > > > > > fan of the TMO..." and "This is not a defense of the TMO". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Of course it's a total crap deal, as I made QUITE clear. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The issue was your shouting your mouth off by saying > > things > > > > that > > > > > you > > > > > > > > obviously don't think through. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > See if you can limit your comments to that and not try and > > > > > divert it > > > > > > > > to something that we obviously agree on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can't you proffer a simple "I stand corrected"? Is that > > so > > > > hard > > > > > for > > > > > > > > you to do? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the minimum wage, I stand corrected. But with what's > > left of > > > > the > > > > > > > economy and jobs after the fine work of your selfish, greedy > > > > > > > free-market deregulate-the-industry pals in the financial > > > > sector it > > > > > > > just might be the only thing available for someone with the > > > > skills > > > > > > > mentioned above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now let's see you proffer a simple "I stand corrected" with > > > > regard to > > > > > > > legitimate global warming science and the > > fraudulent 'experts' > > > > you put > > > > > > > forward to deny its causes. > > > > > > > > > > > > How silly. > > > > > > > > > > > > In my imagination I see you locked in a room with e.g. > > Professor > > > > > > Richard S Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology, > > > > > > Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT. > > > > > > > > > > > > How will you make your case for "fraudulent expert" in those > > > > > > circumstances? I suspect the conversation will be a bit one- > > sided. > > > > > > > > > > > > (I am not saying that Lindzen is right - just that you are > > > > ignorant to > > > > > > think/assert that climate change scepticism is "fraudulent") > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Expressing skepticism isn't fraudulent, but stating faulty > > opinions > > > > > and bogus claims as fact is. None of the skeptics have debunked > > the > > > > > overwhelming globally recognized peer-reviewed scientific body > > of > > > > > evidence and global consensus on its basis that global warming > > and > > > > its > > > > > causes are real. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, they have...time and time and time again. > > > > > > > > Tell you what, Bongo: you cite the "overwhelming globally > > recognized > > > > peer-reviewed scientific body of evidence" you refer to above and > > > > I'll provide the debunking. > > > > > > I stand by my statement: > > > > > > "Expressing skepticism isn't fraudulent, but stating faulty opinions > > > and bogus claims as fact is. None of the skeptics have debunked the > > > overwhelming globally recognized peer-reviewed scientific body of > > > evidence and global consensus on its basis that global warming and > > its > > > causes are real." > > > > > > The challenge is yours Magoo. So far you've shown nothing I've seen > > > that wasn't easily exposed as crap for one reason or another. > > > > > > > > > Just as I thought...you can't come up with anything that can't easily > > be debunked. > > > > No, the challenge is NOT mine, Bongo. It is YOU and the global- > > warming extremists who are suggesting catastrophic man-made global > > warming, not me. Therefore, the onus is on YOU, not ME. > > > Here is the 2008 113 nation Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change > Report: > http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/technical-papers/climate-change-water-en.pdf > > It has an extensive comprehensive directory so you can find just about > any specifics you may wish to debunk. Good luck, Magoo. >
This is a political report, as everyone knows. How about a non-political report?
