--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nyah, Vaj, you have no anti-TM agenda...
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > L.
> > > 
> > > But Lawson, what did Gina say that was not true?
> > >
> > 
> > I've spoken with her before, IIRC.  
> > She hasn't lived at MUM for many many years, since before Ashley
> Deans took
> >  over, I believe
> > 
> > Additinally TM mantras are NOT derived from the names of Hindu deities;
> > the advent of SIMS was NOT the biggest (or even a very big)) factor in
> > TM growth in the 70s-- Merv Griffon viewers were; the 3rd DIstrict COurt
> >  deliberately avoided deciding if TM itself was "too religious" and
> instead
> > only looked at teh complete package as taught in the New Jersey schools;
> > "coercive persuasion is subtle and slow" is obviously an oxymoron,
> in this
> > context; etc.
> > 
> > Given your own lopsided view of TM research and your selective
> interpretation
> > of articles you yourself have posted here, I'm not surprised you
> didn't notice
> > any of these points....
> > 
> > 
> > Lawson
> >
> Careful Lawson,  I just asked for your interpretation, I did not give
> mine. Though it looks like most of what you are saying are matters of
> opinion and POV.   When you are pushed you often agree with me on what
> the research does and does not say.
>
]\?

What about 

> > Additinally TM mantras are NOT derived from the names of Hindu deities;
> > the advent of SIMS was NOT the biggest (or even a very big)) factor in
> > TM growth in the 70s-- Merv Griffon viewers were; the 3rd DIstrict COurt
> >  deliberately avoided deciding if TM itself was "too religious" and
> instead
> > only looked at teh complete package as taught in the New Jersey schools;


is an opinion or POV, and please explain explicitly why you disagree with

 > "coercive persuasion is subtle and slow" is obviously an oxymoron,
>>  in this context;


L

Reply via email to