and well said!
how i think: i don't care whether you judge my actions, or reach
conclusions, or not. i honestly and frankly do not care. sorry,
you'll have to be content with the conclusions you reach about me. i
am not about to try and change them.
as for my history and karma as a result of my postings, yes, like
you and the other billions on the planet, i must live with those
facts of life. oh well.
like i said, this place is all about swapping energy. to
exhaustively and selectively catalog my postings and then indict me
with them gets you zip. or less.
the moment has passed. you missed the bus. for now, until it rolls
around again. its the moment that counts. unless it doesn't...that
is how i think. like it love it hate it or forget it.
am i enlightened? unmistakably YES. am i enlightened? unmistakably
NO. your choice. enjoy your day! :)
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@.. .>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, enlightened_ dawn11
> <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > i am enjoying the de facto title of this post; what is the
nature
> > of attachment?
>
> I changed it. My bad. :-)
>
> [ I'm going to reply as if you were serious in
> this post, and not just evading. BTW, I don't
> give a frak about your "identity" behind your
> screen name...that is a given as far as I am
> concerned. What I am interested in "pinning down"
> is how that identity thinks. ]
