--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <fflmod@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Even sadder in a way to think about is > > > how much it says about the long-term > > > reality of TM (as opposed to its claims) > > > when its two most compulsive defenders > > > on this forum are a man pretending to > > > be a woman... > > > > > > I spend so little time now reading the posters > > > that fall into the troll and nutbar category > > > that I do not even know to which poster you are > > > referring. > > > > That's OK, he's lying, as usual. He's upset > > because a whole bunch of his other lies have > > been exposed in the past couple of days, and > > that always drives him to tell *more* lies > > in an attempt to make himself feel better. > > Talk about sad... > > Even sadder might be the "editor" who > regularly posts here telling us what > people really "mean" by the things they > say (as she does above),
Um, no, didn't do that above. and "translating" > what they said into what she believes they > said, What she believes is *behind* what they said. and who nonetheless claims to not be > able to tell who the poster in question > really is. Um, no, don't believe I've done that. > What does *that* say about "lying?" What does *Barry* think that says about "lying" when none of what he says above is true? > Could her defense of "her" new identity Barry's gone off the deep end. Now *I* have a "new identity"?? > have anything to do with the fact that > 1) he/she's one of the only people left > on this forum who interacts with her, Or did he just get confused about who he was referring to? And he's lying about there being only a few people here who interact with me. See another post for documentation. > and 2) that he/she's one of the few > remaining posters willing to play "pile > on" to her "Gotta demonize the people > who criticize TM...just gotta" games? Barry means "criticize those who are consistently dishonest and spend most of their time demonizing other posters, usually TMers." > Or could it be mere incompetence on the > part of a second-rate editor? > > It's all relative, you see, and as > unknowable as the workings of karma. > When she claims that a poster is me > pretending to be someone else, that's > Truth, Don't think I ever claimed that, but I'm willing to be proved wrong. and OK. When someone suggests > the same of someone whom she perceives > to be on "her side" in her petty tyrant > games, that's a Lie, and Not OK. Nope, never suggested that Ruth lied about thinking Tim Guy was Lawson. > But by far the funniest thing in this > exchange is the fact that gullible_fool > may have wondered about which poster was > a man pretending to be a woman, but he > had *no problem* figuring out who the > poster was who no longer bothered to > even pretend to be a human being. Given that this was Barry's characterization, that's hardly surprising.