I'd be happy to give him some of mine, but I don't
think any of us really need to do that. Everybody
so far has been in favor of not penalizing him for
going over by two posts this past week, including
Rick and Alex.

This coming week, maybe if he gets close to his limit
and feels like he could benefit from having a few
extra, he could speak up and we could again vote in
favor.

But it's not as if there is only a certain number of
posts that *can be made* per week here, such that if
someone goes over, somebody else has to give up some.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" <emptyb...@...> wrote:
>
> Rick Nelson has 40, I've got 45 and Lawson has some of his own. 
> 
> Give Kirk ours. We need to hear him and he is funny to read anyway. Everyone 
> wins. If someone else on the list complains in secret to your then just hand 
> over some of mine to them. Everyone will get their just time and be satisfied.
> 
> In the hospital where I work we do this all the time. It is quite usual. 
> 
> Just do it and don't be stingy. Send us a private email with the results so 
> we know the post quantities transferred and so we don't post inadvertently.
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> >
> > Would ya'll be willing to grant Kirk a one-time pardon for overposting,
> > rather than our having to boot him for a week? He's been going through some
> > tough stuff and could probably use our continued camaraderie and feedback.
> > He was aware of the posting limit but accidentally went over. He's cool with
> > being suspended if need be. If this is going to result in lots of other
> > folks saying "I deserve a pardon too" then I don't want to do it, because it
> > gets too hard for the moderators to deal with it.


Reply via email to