I don't think mmy was that worried about religion here as he spent the last 20 yrs of his life talking about the vedas in all sorts of esoteric ways and esp with reference to hindu brahmin pundits doing their ceremonies as they should.
He didn't talk about kundalini because his didn't know much about it. If he did know about it then he wouldn't have brought out the sidhis in such an irresponsible way - many many people should not have been taught and all should have received more careful monitoring and education. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "BillyG." <wg...@...> > To: <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:19 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Why MMY seldom mentioned the Chakras and Kundalini. > > > > Actually there are two reasons, one is that it has Religious connotations > > with Hinduism and we don't want that do we! And the other, is that it is > > a very high state of development and few meditators (of any discipline) > > ever experience it. Why even mention it, TM is Yoga-lite for modernity > > anyway, and that's good. > > > > That being said, I think it was deplorable that he left without giving a > > clear teaching and understanding of these fundamental principles, and to > > think TM could be considered a complete Vedic system, unreal! OK granted, > > they may call them something different like nadis or whatnot, but come on > > we all know what they are, chickens! :-) > > > > PS. It forces TM'ers to look else where for answers, like Sri Sri anybody? > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uofjzGoR8JA > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > To subscribe, send a message to: > > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com > > > > Or go to: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > > and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
