--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > I could say alot about this; crying for a dead pet for example. > > Why are some fools crying for a pet which could be perfectly happy in a > > dead state, striving as it is for further accomplishments and finally a > > human nervous-system ? > > They are reminded of their own eventual death, and the sense of loss is > > self-pity rather than love for the animal. > > In my experience seing people "grieve" for a pet is purely pathetic founded > > on intense ignorance and "love" for everything past. > > So your whole "spirituality" front is just a cover for being a callus, > heartless person devoid of the lowest level of emotional intelligence? > > > > > > Then there is the rather complicated factor of how much energy an animal > > could draw from your own resourses. Touch an animal and you will > > immediately know the answer to this question from the immediate reaction in > > your hand and arm. > > Some animals are harmless and will be good for you. Others are drawn to you > > because it is desperate to get a human nervous-system, or it is ill and > > wants your energy to be healed. > > > > India bias ? Not really. > > >
The prospect of re-enlivenment of the mythical Vedic civilization sounds worse than living in Germany in the 1930s.
