--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: <snip> > > Here are links to two critiques that expose very > > serious flaws in Nanda's scholarship, logic, and > > scientific understanding, from very different > > perspectives: > > > > http://thetrashbin.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/in-defense-of-spirituality/ > > > > A critique of an article by Nanda criticizing Sam Harris. > > I read this link. Of course, now we are getting way > out there. Someone criticizing a criticism.
LOL!! Since most of what Nanda writes is criticism, it means any critique of her work is going to be "way out there," according to you. > I would have to read Harris, Nanda and then the > critique of the critique to draw conclusions. It > looks like it isn't so much a dispute over scholarship > but a dispute over the rationality of believing that > ESP and other types of not yet proven mystical notions. That's a disgracefully dishonest take on this critique.
