--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > > From: shempmcgurk > > > > > > Which Nabby do you prefer? > > > > > > The Old Nabby who so haughtily looked down his nose at > > > us and responded to our posts with the airs of the cult > > > member that he is? > > > > > > ...or... > > > > > > The New Nabby who so haughtily looks down his nose at us > > > and does NOT respond to our posts with the airs of the > > > cult member that he is? > > > > I vote for the old Nabby. The new Nabby just posts links. > > The old Nabby was as fun as a barrel of monkeys. > > While I too miss the Old Nabby because he was > almost unique here in presenting a cultist's > view of the world without trying to pretend > that it wasn't a cultist's view of the world, > the New Nabby has advantages, too. > > He's like the cult version of tinyurl: > > http://www.tinycult.com/108werule > > Instead of just spewing TM propaganda, he posts > a short link to it, one that one can click upon > or not, depending on one's interest. > > A *vast* improvement over, say, the person who > has recently posted literally thousands of lines > of "explanation" for why her attempt to discredit > a scientist who challenges the silly TM "quantum > consciousness" dogma isn't the act of a cultist > or a TM apologist. > > Would that she could learn to use the tinycult > service as well. :-) >
Hyah Unc, you don't have a "thing" about Judy... L.
