--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchy...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson" <nelsonriddle2001@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote: > > > > > > As Barry graces us with another steaming pile of doo doo dumping on > > > FFLife, let's examine how he ignores historical facts and prefers fiction > > > to facts: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Boo Hoo. Hillary lost. > > > > > > > > And she did it while going deeper into debt as > > > > a percentage of her whole campaign budget than > > > > the United States is with regard to its budget. > > > > And some still think that someone this fiscally > > > > incompetent would have been able to deal with > > > > the economic mess left to us. > > > > > > > > > > Hillary paid it off her debt with cold cash and Obama plans to pay off > > > the county's debt by incurring more debt. It's a horse a piece for > > > Barry's money management argument and irrelevant to the conversation. > > > > > > > There is only one bottom line to all your guff, > > > > Raunchy. And it's interesting that you don't > > > > even seem to know what it is. > > > > > > > > That bottom line is, "Hillary didn't lose... > > > > she was MADE to lose by evildoers. It's > > > > *their* fault, not hers." > > > SNIP, > > Didn't she concede and so no vote was taken although it looked like she > > would have won? looked odd I thought. > > > > Hillary did not concede during the primary. She went to the Denver convention > with her delegates. The DNC rigged a sham of a roll call vote, not at all in > the tradition of historic roll votes and the call went as far as I think > Nevada, at which time she released her remaining delegates to Obama. >
That's not so untraditional, as I understand it. Lawson