On May 30, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Marek Reavis wrote:
Not necessarily, but that's not the point. However he got the honorific, Maharishi certainly felt it was appropriate and never demurred. Many agreed with him and lots didn't.
Sorry to be a stickler but you're assuming it's honorific without any evidence to support that. All we truly know is that it's an alias (esp. since it's not the actual name on his passport). What would be helpful is to see a transcript of the alleged Cochlin interview or to hear an MP3 of a recording!
