All the more reason to not rush anything. Write the bill, bring it to the floor
and debate it line by line. Allow the public to read it and communicate with
their reps and senators and amend it before setting it in stone. They're saying
it wouldn't go in effect until something like 2013 anyway. Do it right or don't
do it at all, is all I'm saying.
--- On Sat, 7/25/09, authfriend <jst...@panix.com> wrote:
From: authfriend <jst...@panix.com>
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Doing Sanyama on Universal Health Care'
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, July 25, 2009, 6:55 PM
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@ ...> wrote:
>
> How many bills have been rushed through the congress
> and not read and debated before being voted on this
> year alone?
As long as you're just making a prediction of what might
happen eventually, fine. All kinds of things *could*
happen eventually. But what you were saying sounded as
if you were claiming it was already engraved in stone,
and that's what I was objecting to.
P.S.: Health care is *already* rationed by the insurance
companies. If it's done right, a public option would
reduce the amount of rationing.
