--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, scienceofabundance <no_re...@...> wrote: > > I've been thinking of how little can be inferred from the titles of FFL posts > as we wind our way through topics completely unrelated to the original title. >
Yea, seems is an un-written FFL policy guideline of 'don't ask, don't tell, & don't change the subject heading' and then really see who is really reading all this stuff. Is just the way it goes. Got to act quick or it all goes by fast. 4instance, i did had some anecdotal things from the street about enrollments at MSAE to post back a while ago that i dropped instead once the original thread about MUM enrollment got overrun with the homosexual stuff. But the homosexual stuff at MUM became interesting pulp in its moment instead. Is just the way of it on the internet publishing. I do find it helps a lot to set my spam filter against the non-meditators on the FFL list. Is way more useful and effective to just read the posts of the practicing meditators. When non-meditators actualy have something worthwhile to write it gets picked up in the echo later by better more germain meditating FFL writers. JGD, -D > Thinking of this, I just entered "MUM Enrollment" into Bing.com and guess > what came up as the third (!) entry? Just read between the lines....! > _____________________________________________________________ > Message #225652 > Re: MUM enrollment etc Saturday, July 25th, 2009 > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Regarding male Teachers; I would love to meet a > > > female Lama, are there any ? If not, why not ? > > > > Nabby is still reluctant to admit to being gay, but I think it's > > a positive step that he has admitted his...uh...fondness for > > animals, so here's a female lama I think he'd hit it off with: > > > > [http://uweb.und.nodak.edu/~andrew.thole/BusterLlama.jpg] > > > > I love her. She is one cute llama! > ___________________________________________________________________ > In Google, the first two (!) entries were from the "MUM Enrollment" thread - > but from a few days ago. > > I cannot imagine what someone who is looking for MUM enrollment numbers would > think as s/he sees these entries. >
