Partial transcript: As we draw close to finalizing and passing real health insurance reform, the defenders of the
Notice how Obama has shifted the discussion from "health care reform" to "health INSURANCE reform." IMO the distinction is simply a weasel out of emphasizing health care. I suspect at the end of the day, the insurance industry will get what they want and then some. status quo and political point-scorers in Washington are growing fiercer in their opposition. In recent days and weeks, some have been using misleading information to defeat what they know is the best chance of reform we have ever had. That is why it is important, especially now, as Senators and Representatives head home and meet with their constituents, for you, the American people, to have all the facts. So, let me explain what reform will mean for you. And let me start by dispelling the outlandish rumors that reform will promote euthanasia, cut Medicaid, or bring about a government takeover of health care. That's simply not true. This isn't about putting government in charge of your health insurance; it's about putting you in charge of your health insurance. The right wing talking point on this is wrong. They fear a public option (translation: government in charge). Obama is saying the government will not be in charge (translation: no public option). When I hear "putting you in charge," I hear GW Bush saying, "Health Savings Account." Again, "health insurance reform" I know he's talking about this in a different context, but I my ears are attuned to Obama code when I hear it and I'm suspicious. Under the reforms we seek, if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan. And while reform is obviously essential for the 46 million Americans who don't have health insurance, it will also provide more stability and security to the hundreds of millions who do. Right now, we have a system that works well for the insurance industry, but that doesn't always work well for you. What we need, and what we will have when we pass health insurance reform, Again "health insurance reform" are consumer protections to make sure that those who have insurance are treated fairly and that insurance companies are held accountable. We will require insurance companies to cover routine checkups and preventive care, like mammograms, colonoscopies, or eye and foot exams for diabetics, so we can avoid chronic illnesses that cost too many lives and too much money. "Requiring" insurance to cover prevention is a great idea but who will pay? The insurance companies certainly aren't going to pick up the tab. Question: If we require insurance to cover prevention will the consumer be required to participate in prevention? We will stop insurance companies from denying coverage because of a person's medical history. I will never forget watching my own mother, as she fought cancer in her final days, worrying about whether her insurer would claim her illness was a preexisting condition. I have met so many Americans who worry about the same thing. That's why, under these reforms, insurance companies will no longer be able to deny coverage because of a previous illness or injury. And insurance companies will no longer be allowed to drop or water down coverage for someone who has become seriously ill. Your health insurance ought to be there for you when it counts and reform will make sure it is. This is good. Hillary made a strong case for this as well. With reform, insurance companies will also have to limit how much you can be charged for out-of-pocket expenses. And we will stop insurance companies from placing arbitrary caps on the amount of coverage you can receive in a given year or a lifetime because no one in America should go broke because of illness. This is good and I agree. In the end, the debate about health insurance reform boils down to a choice between two approaches. The first is almost guaranteed to double health costs over the next decade, make millions more Americans uninsured, leave those with insurance vulnerable to arbitrary denials of coverage, and bankrupt state and federal governments. That's the status quo. That's the health care system we have right now. I agree. The status quo is not good. Obama nicely lays out the specifics. So, we can either continue this approach, or we can choose another one one that will protect people against unfair insurance practices; provide quality, affordable insurance to every American; and bring down rising costs that are swamping families, businesses, and our budgets. That's the health care system we can bring about with reform. Vague, vague and again vague rhetoric. There are those who are focused on the so-called politics of health care; who are trying to exploit differences or concerns for political gain. That's to be expected. That's Washington. But let's never forget that this isn't about politics. This is about people's lives. This is about people's businesses. This is about America's future. That's what is at stake. That's why health insurance reform is so important. And that's why we must get this done and why we will get this done by the end of this year. Great and still not one word about a public option or who will pay for required coverage.
