This, by the way, is why I do not identify myself
as being a Buddhist.  :-)

I get that the guy believes all this stuff and is
enthusiastic about it and all, but honestly I find
this rap as distasteful as I would find a similar
rap by some fundamentalist Christian or fundamentalist
Veda-ist or spaced-out Newager. The absolutism of it 
just astounds me, and not in a good way.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "yifuxero" <yifux...@...> wrote:
>
> by Tripitaka Master Hsuan Hua
> Within Buddhism, there are very many important sutras.
> However, the most important Sutra is the Shurangama Sutra. If
> there are places which have the Shurangama Sutra, then the Proper
> Dharma dwells in the world. If there is no Shurangama Sutra, then
> the Dharma Ending Age appears. Therefore, we Buddhist disciples,
> each and every one, must bring our strength, must bring our blood,
> and must bring our sweat to protect tcahe Shurangama Sutra. In the
> Sutra of the Ultimate Extinction of the Dharma, it says very, very
> clearly that in the Dharma Ending Age, the Shurangama Sutra is
> the first to disappear, and the rest of the sutras disappear after it. If
> the Shurangama Sutra does not disappear, then the Proper Dharma
> Age is present. Because of that, we Buddhist disciples must use our
> lives to protect the Shurangama Sutra, must use vows and
> resolution to protect the Shurangama Sutra, and cause the
> Shurangama Sutra to be known far and wide, reaching every nook
> and cranny, reaching into each and every dust-mote, reaching out to
> the exhaustion of empty space and of the Dharma Realm. If we can
> do that, then there will be a time of Proper Dharma radiating great
> light.
> Why would the Shurangama Sutra be destroyed? It is because
> it is too true. The Shurangama Sutra is the Buddha's true body. The
> Shurangama Sutra is the Buddha's sharira. The Shurangama Sutra
> is the Buddha's true and actual stupa and shrine. Therefore, because
> x
> the Shurangama Sutra is so true, all the demon kings use all kinds
> of methods to destroy the Shurangama Sutra. They begin by
> starting rumors, saying that the Shurangama Sutra is phony. Why
> do they say the Shurangama Sutra is phony? It is because the
> Shurangama Sutra speaks too truly, especially in the sections on
> The Four Decisive Deeds, the Twenty-five Sages Describing
> Perfect Penetration, and the States of the Fifty Skandha Demons.
> Those of off-center persuasions and externally-oriented ways,
> weird demons and strange freaks, are unable to stand it. Consequently
> there are a good many senseless people who claim that the
> Shurangama Sutra is a forgery.
> Now, the principles set forth in the Shurangama Sutra are on
> the one hand proper, and on the other in accord with principle, and
> the weird demons and strange freaks, those in various cults and
> sects, all cannot hide away their forms. Most senseless people, in
> particular unwise scholars and garbage-collecting professors
> "Tread upon the holy writ." With their extremely scant and partial
> understanding, they are confused and unclear, lacking real erudition
> and true and actual wisdom. That is why they falsely criticize. We
> who study the Buddhadharma should very deeply be aware of these
> circumstances. Therefore, wherever we go, we should bring up the
> Shurangama Sutra. Wherever we go, we should propagate the
> Shurangama Sutra. Wherever we go, we should introduce the
> Shurangama Sutra to people. Why is that? It is because we wish to
> cause the Proper Dharma long to dwell in the world.
> If the Shurangama Sutra is regarded as true, then there is no
> problem. To verify its truth, let me say that if the Shurangama
> Sutra were phony, then I would willingly fall into the hells forever
> through all eternity—for being unable to recognize the Buddhadharma—
> for mistaking the false for true. If the Shurangama Sutra is
> true, then life after life in every time I make the vow to propagate
> the Great Dharma of the Shurangama, that I shall in every time and
> every place propagate the true principles of the Shurangama.
> xi
>


Reply via email to