Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Special Prosecutor; "Rove Not Target of Investigation"

[MDixon6569]

In a message dated 7/14/05 1:44:52 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > NY Times standing on principle when they could nail a  Republican > administration  official?  Naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! I know I must be hopelssly naive, but it seems to me that Judith Miller, being a reporter of merit and integrity, might actually being upholding long honored journalistic ethics. I wonder if your view relects your own level of integrity and portends what you would do if you were able to BF a liberal official by revealing confidential sources. Well, I suppose if  I knew about some  criminal  activity that endangered the lives of government employees or anybody else, I would have to go public with it. What is more important, my  journalistic word to a criminal or somebody protecting one, or the lives of innocent people?<And wouldn't the left hold Judith Miller up on a pedestal if she could kill two birds with one stone?Protect lives, put away somebody in the administration. I think the left would actually congratulate her for "overcoming" such a dilemma and doing the right thing. That is, if it was a republican. However,she could be perceived as a traitor and violator of journalistic ethics by her own peers and political persuasion if her source were any thing other than a republican. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.