Take for instance, this wild irrational assumption that eveything
written down in the Bible or koran or the Vedas as absolutely accurate and
true, and then trying to fit empirical reality into that world-view even if it
has major contradictions with Science.
That IMO is pseudo-scientific.
I was listening to a lecture by Dhyananda Saraswati swamigal in
India. He made a devastating remark, " A scripture that does not follow logic
is not a scripture at all, One must pass a stricture on it."
--- On Tue, 10/27/09, WillyTex <willy...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Spiritism v Spiritual
Date: Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 7:24 AM
The scientific method takes as its basis
the empirical, repeatable observations of
the physical world. The scientific method
refers to a means of acquiring knowledge.
The pseudoscientific method takes as its
basis the supernatural, observations of
the spirtual or spirit world. The fundamental
principle of spiritism, is a belief in the
existence of spirits.
