--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > One of the assumptions that I was talking 
> > > about previously that we have all been spoon fed is that 
because 
> a 
> > > culture is deep inland it must have been be sea-faring inept. 
> This 
> > > is unlikely since Tibetans travelled far and wide. Buddhism 
> > > naturally spread across Tibet and China for the sole reason 
that 
> > > they were not really distinct and travelled with ease. 
> > 
> > They traveled much further than that.  There are huge
> > outposts of Tibetan culture in Mongolia and Manchuria
> > and Russia, and evidence that Tibetans once inhabited
> > areas of the Pyrennes.  Traveling to spread the dharma
> > is what they *did*.  Suggesting that they traveled to
> > North America is certainly not out of the question.>>>
> 
> And if the Chinese had those huge ocean going junks and were used 
to 
> travelling vast distances, then the Tibetan Bhuddists would 
> ceratinly have been involved in that due to your statement about 
how 
> far and wide they were already established. Interesting. Thanks
> 
> > 
> > The possible link between the Hopis and the Navajos
> > has been suggested by many people, including the Dalai
> > Lama.  I don't know whether it has been established
> > or not physically (via DNA tests), but if you knew
> > Tibetan culture that wouldn't even be necessary. They
> > have tales of whole monasteries or villages picking up 
> > and "migrating" to another place en masse, via mass
> > reincarnation.>>>
> 
> Also, the word Navajo is interesting. It may be related to the 
> Sankrti 'Nau'(pronounced with the 'u' almost like a 'v')  
> meaning 'ship' which gives us ('Navy, Nautical). So if a race were 
> ocean going travellers and it was as natural to them as crossing 
> vast deserts by camel was to the desert tribes, then it is highly 
> likely that they would call themselves 'The Mariners', which in 
> Sanskrit would be the "Nav..." Or those who met them would call 
them 
> that.

I think its a stretch to assign linguistic stuff likethat. The 
etymology of American langauges is a large field of study. Do you 
have any evidence that there are linguistic ties to Asian languages?

I mean, the closest tie that anyone can find to Japanese appears to 
be Hungarian or something. Surely such obvious similarities between 
Sanskrit and American languages would have been noted in the 
scholarly works?




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to