I was aware that he was married and I am not exceptionally "in the know" so I still don't understand what the big deal is.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "metoostill" <metoost...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > A guy who will deny the existence of *his own > > > wife and kids* and keep them hidden for 8 years > > > because of "Maharishisez" is never going to do > > > anything in his entire life *other than* > > > Maharishisez. > > > > (Unless, of course, it was Tony and his wife who insisted > > on secrecy and "Maharishisez" is just a cover story.) > > > This will be a mental space to preserve for a group who want to continue > thinking "Tony, OK, something wrong, but MMY, perfection." I have to wonder > which is more important to preserve in that instance, MMY's perfection or > the individual thinking about themself "I couldn't have been that wrong, > could I?" Not trying to point the finger far away, I had 3 decades deep of > my own inside. Hey, it is what it is. We aren't dead yet. There is still a > future as well as a past, capiche? No shame in being an idealist or a > utopian, but at the same time the road to hell is paved with good intentions, > only to mean that idealism and utopian intentions do not guarantee good > ideas. If you were wrong, and you realize it, shrug and go on to the next > thing. >
