Anyway... I can confirm that Schiffgins has ''close male friend'' but for me that it's not issue here. It's about ''PEOPLE TELLING LIES'' I don't care if Nader would have 100 wives and 1000 children. It's about credibility. MMY NEVER MENTIONED that Nader is going to be married... Ask guys on Purusha what was told to them!!!!
This is story about dirty politics and power... that has nothing to do with spirituality whatsoever... period... who likes can folow... 2010/1/18 TurquoiseB <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> > > > Sorry...it might have been shukra who mentioned > Raja Schiffgen's "close male friend." > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>, > TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>, > nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>, > "shukra69" <shukra69@> wrote: > > > > > > > > People here accept a gay Raja easily but Maharaja with children > > > > is a shock? He is meant to be the leader of the movement for > > > > householders so of course what do you think the Vedic tradition > > > > is? It would be a tragedy for a Maharaja to have no wife and > > > > child. > > > > > > Tragedy no, but the fact is that the majority of the Masters > > > in our Holy Tradition were householders. > > > > Technical question for Nablus: > > > > If, as Zoran indicates, Raja Schiffgens has a "close > > male friend" and they live together, does that make > > him a "householder?" > > > > Curious minds want to know... > > > > :-) > > > > >
