--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "gable52556" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > If you are not biased for Amma (supporter) and against TMO 
> > (denouncer) can you please explain the following highly 
> prejudiced 
> > and loaded statement:
> > ""Take a look, for example, at how Amma's admirers describe 
> her.
> > Without exception, they paint a picture of a humble, 
> down-to-earth
> > woman whose charitable projects make an immediate 
> difference for
> > people in need -- a far cry from the TM movement with its 
> trappings
> > of monarchy and its seemingly endless string of grandiose 
> schemes.""
> 
> That statement summarizes the background for my argument 
> that Amma's popularity in the Fairfield community may stem 
> directly from some of the TM movement's own problems.
> 
> > > One person said the column should have included 
> interviews 
> > > with people other than university officials who are happy with 
> the 
> > > TM movement.  I'd like to draw an analogy here.  When you 
> read 
> > > a story about something the president has done, typically the 
> > > reporter will quote the president, a few of his aides, and a 
> few 
> > > critics from the Democratic side of the aisle.  That way, the 
> > > reporter tells both sides of the story.  Should every reporter 
> who 
> > > writes a story about the president seek out a half-dozen 
> satisfied 
> > > Republicans to talk about what a great job they think he's 
> doing?>>
> > 
> > That is a terrible analogy and has no relationship.
> 
> Can you explain why it's a terrible analogy?
> 
> > The fact is you are prejudiced against the TMO, and support 
> Amma 
> > organization, and did not want to give the opinions of people 
> who 
> > are happy with TM who live there.
> 
> "The fact is that White House reporters are prejudiced against 
> President Bush, support the Democrats, and do not want to give 
> the opinions of people who are happy with the president."
> 
> For the record, I'm not a partisan for the TM movement, the 
> Amma group, or any other group in town.  I'm pretty much an 
> outside observer.  I'm not from Fairfield, and when I moved here 
> three years ago, I knew next to nothing about the university or the 
> movement.  All the opinions I expressed in the column were 
> formed as a result of my observations here, not as a result of any 
> pre-existing prejudice.

Erick - I appreciated your editorial and liked what you included and
you're probably going in the right direction in your conclusions too.
Just to state my biases: 34 yrs TM practice, 30 yrs TM teacher, I've
seen Amma once, spent about 5 months in Fairfield, I'm not into vedic
raja's in America, but I do like the bagpipers, and I wish the TMO was
more transparent.

JohnY




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to