One can only imagine the horror of Judy's personality at the time her father 
considered her to be insufferable prior to Judy learning TM in 1976.  
It's 34 years later……..perhaps her dad embellished what he told her then, in 
the now-proven false hope that her neuroses would abate.    




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > When I accuse you of sophistry is it in regard to a specific 
> > > > technique you are using.
> > > 
> > > I am not using any "technique." I'm being completely
> > > straightforward. You are not.
> > 
> > Yeah, that doesn't work with someone who knows what
> > sophistry refers to.
> 
> I'm sure you have your own special definition. I'm going
> by the one in my dictionary--
> 
> subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation
> 
> --or Wikipedia:
> 
> a specious argument used for deceiving someone
> 
> That's what you do. Not all that "subtle" to those who
> have been following closely (i.e., you and me) but
> sufficiently so to fool casual observers.
> 
> > > > I am not labeling you as a sophist as an identity. Your
> > > > attempt to shift the discussion into being about my 
> > > > character "mean"
> > > 
> > > There was no such attempt on my part. I made a side comment
> > > on your post to Willytex about *my* choices, which you
> > > decided to interpret as a slam on you, which *you* then used
> > > to shift the discussion to Bad Judy, collaborating with Barry
> > > to demonize me.
> > > 
> > > The rest of this is just more of your standard slippery
> > > sophistry when you've been caught out. As I said, I'm
> > > pretty sure it'll fool everybody else just fine.
> > 
> > Again you misuse a technical term with zero evidence thinking
> > it it a general put down.
> 
> Like I say, I'm going by the standard dictionary
> definition. And I've already provided gobs of
> evidence that this is precisely what you do.
> 
> > I am not buying your bullshit and now after a short drum
> > roll what do you do:
> > > 
> > > FOAD.
> > 
> > FUCK OFF AND DIE, why use an acronym when we can savor your
> > malevolence in full by spelling it all out.
> 
> I think everyone here knows what the acronym means.
> 
> Besides, I like the way the sound of it conveys disgust:
> 
> FOAD.
>

Reply via email to