--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_re...@...> wrote:

Really excellent Nabby, thanks for posting this.



>
> 
> 
> We don't need a messiah (and anyway, it isn't me)
> Coincidence led to my being hailed as a prince of peace. But change will
> come from our own hard work, not a deity
> 
> 
> 
>     *  [Raj Patel]   <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/rajpatel>
>     *
>     * Raj Patel <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/rajpatel>
>     * guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.uk/> , Sunday 11 April 2010
> 19.00 BST
>     * Article history
> <http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2010/apr/11/religion-peace-social\
> -justice-messiah#history-link-box>
> 
> 
> Firstborn sons of British Asian families aren't so much raised as feted,
> and as a child I became quite comfortable being a little prince. At
> seven years old, I wanted the privileges of primogeniture to carry on
> forever. When people asked what I wanted to be when I grew up, I
> responded with the full spectrum of acceptable answers: Accountant!
> Dentist! Quantity Surveyor! Secretly, though, I wanted to be full-time
> royalty. From what I saw of the British monarchy – and I have yet to
> be disabused of this view – it seemed that if you were born in the
> right place and time, you could enjoy almost permanent adulation, free
> money and long hours of indolence.
> 
> I mention this first because earlier this year a trickle, and then a
> flood, of email asked whether I was, in fact a prince. Specifically,
> people asked whether I was Maitreya
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maitreya>  – The World Teacher – a
> prince of peace, the leader of a movement that might be able to save the
> planet from itself. Others wrote to ask whether I was the antichrist,
> the Prince of Darkness.
> 
> As the Guardian
> <http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/apr/09/patel-not-messiah-naughty-bo\
> y>  reported, the deluge began after a number of coincidences seemed to
> match me up with the man foretold by followers of a group called Share
> International <http://www.share-international.org/> , founded by
> Scottish mystic Benjamin Crème. I'd done little to earn the title of
> Maitreya, though I admit some parallels between my life and that
> described in the prophecy.
> 
> Have I lived in London? Yes. Am I interested in social justice and
> sharing the world's resources? Indeed I am. Do I care about feeding the
> world? Certainly. Was I on American television soon before Crème
> announced the arrival of Maitreya? Sort of. On 12 January, I appeared on
> a spoof rightwing talk show called the Colbert Report
> <http://fxuk.com/shows/the-colbert-report> . I'd also been on BBC World,
> CNN, Democracy Now and al-Jazeera before then, but it seems you can't be
> a deity unless you do Comedy Central.
> 
> So what, according to Share International, does Maitreya do? Through a
> doctrine of sharing, fraternity, social justice and co-operation, he
> (and it does seem to be a he, not a she) brings humanity back from
> economic and ecological collapse through new forms of spiritual
> community. As it happens, I do think that sharing, fraternity, justice
> and co-operation are terrific things. I also think that prioritising the
> needs of the poor, hungry and oppressed is a non-negotiable part of a
> sustainable future.
> 
> Unfortunately, I think that's where the resemblances end. It frustrates
> me only a little less than it might disappoint those looking for
> Maitreya that, in fact, I'm just an ordinary bloke. Not that my protests
> of not-being-the-messiah have been heeded. I wrote a short piece on my
> blog suggesting that, like the hero of Life of Brian
> <http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079470/> , I was the victim of a case of
> mistaken identity, and that "you've got to work it out for yourselves".
> This didn't fly. I was reminded by my correspondents that the Maitreya
> would deny divinity. And when I suggested that I wasn't the messiah,
> "but a very naughty boy", others pointed out that this was exactly what
> Lucifer would say.
> 
> Crème himself hasn't been able to help. He was recently interviewed
> by Mick Brown, the author of The Spiritual Tourist
> <http://www.amazon.com/Spiritual-Tourist-Personal-Odyssey-Through/dp/158\
> 234034X> , and Crème suggested that I wasn't the messiah but,
> instead, more closely resembled "that chap who does the cricket on the
> radio" – possibly Jonathan Agnew
> <http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/tms/6098364.stm> . But that
> hasn't stopped the internet from churning out its particular brand of
> speculation, and for the media to amplify the frenzy.
> 
> In part, I suspect the reason the story isn't going away – the New
> York Times
> <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/09/us/09sfmetro.html?partner=rss&emc=rss\
> >  just ran a followup – is because it fits a narrative in which
> we're steeped from birth. From the Bible to Knight Rider to The Matrix,
> the story's the same: in crappy times, a single person will emerge to
> make all the difference and turn everything around. Although it makes
> for great viewing, it makes for a bad society. Ultimately, tales about
> messiahs are bedtime stories steeped in power. They're debilitating
> soporifics, inducements to be passive as we wait for social change
> because, some day, our prince will come.
> 
> Why wait, though? If the world is to transform, faith in politicians
> offering hope and change is a recipe for disappointment. Ask almost
> anyone who voted for Obama. Change happens through millions of acts of
> rebellion and mutual aid, not through faith in one great leader. What's
> depressing about this whole Maitreya thing is that it is a sign that
> we've given up on ourselves, that we need to depend on The One rather
> than finding the means to fix our own problems directly.
> 
> The thing is that there are millions of world teachers already. I've
> been lucky enough to report what they're teaching: from former
> petrol-pump attendants in South Africa to masked women in Mexico,
> leaders are subjecting themselves to democratic control, and messing
> with the boundaries of private property so that everyone gets to share
> the world's resources. Their vision of the commons looks a lot like what
> Maitreya might bring to Earth (and for which Elinor Ostrom
> <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1748208/>  won the Nobel
> prize in economics last year). And the good news is that it has been
> here all along.
> 
> This, at least, is the world I'm keen to live in: one without princes
> but with billions of world teachers, in which we live under neither God
> nor Master. It's a recipe for change that makes for poor storytelling
> but great politics.
> 
> The only problem is how to condense it so that someone can chisel it in
> stone.
>


Reply via email to