--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <geezerfr...@...> wrote: > > This topic really agitates you doesn't it Tex? As I've > said, I understand. I was agitated when I first heard > about it myself way back when.
Joe...this is not the first he's heard the allegations, not by a long shot. You're getting his standard response. He's a flak generator, otherwise known as a troll. He particularly likes to throw up flak about movement history. He fondly envisions himself as a sort of "crazy wisdom" guy who forces folks to confront their assumptions by making contradictory or inane statements. He's just not very good at the "wisdom" part. Don't waste your time. > However, I didn't put up a steel door and refuse to consider > information coming from several sources, one of whom would > really fry your brain if you knew. (Out of respect for her > privacy, she will remain anonymous until she chooses to say > something on her own.) BTW, this immediately inspires people to start speculating about who it could be, thereby casting suspicion on all sorts of prominent movement women, probably including the one you have in mind. If you want to protect her privacy, STFU about her. It looks like all you're really doing is boasting about your insider knowledge. > By the way, your "guesses' below are lousy. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" <willytex@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Maybe nobody ever 'caught' him doing anything like > > > > that. > > Joe: > > > Tex, it doesn't make sense to you for the simple > > > reason that you do not want it to make sense. You > > > don't want this to compute since you would short > > > circuit if you allowed yourself to allow this as > > > a possibility. > > > > > So, Joe, how many minutes did you spend in his direct > > company alone, in his room? Zero. In fact, I've seen > > no evidence that you were ever in a room with the guy > > at all, much less being a skin-boy, door stop. My > > guess is that you've never been within a thousand > > feet of the guy, if that. So, your comment makes no > > sense. > > >
