Possibly...but the persons making the claims are challenged to come up with some actual evidence; at least some reasonable hypothesis that makes sense and doesn't rely on Mahareeshee-speak. .... There could be some indirect connection between the mind and QM reality; but this is speculative (as in the case with the Penrose-Hammerhoff ideas). A more fruitful area of inquiry could involve parallels to holography (Cf. "The Holographic Universe" in Wiki). At least, holograms are relative, even the universe as a whole. Just my opinion...the "relationship" between the two aspects of Brahman could be a genuine Paradox; not just mentally "paradoxical" but innately unfathomable. If there are some actual levitators, they are relying on Shakti, which is relative.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shanti2218411" <kc...@...> wrote: > > Krauss makes a good point re Chopra et al, however, ultimately he is just as > clueless as they are,something I'm not sure he understands. > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > » It is safe to say that nobody understands quantum mechanics. Richard > > > Feynman. > > > > There was a time when the newspapers said that only twelve men understood > > the theory of relativity. I do not believe there ever was such a time. > > There might have been a time when only one man did, because he was the only > > guy who caught on, before he wrote his paper. But after people read the > > paper a lot of people understood the theory of relativity in some way or > > other, certainly more than twelve. On the other hand, I think I can safely > > say that nobody understands quantum mechanics > > > > I am going to tell you what nature behaves like. If you will simply admit > > that maybe she does behave like this, you will find her a delightful, > > entrancing thing. Do not keep saying to yourself, if you can possibly avoid > > it, `but how can it be like that?' because you will get `down the drain,' > > into a blind alley from which nobody has yet escaped. Nobody knows how it > > can be like that. > > > > Richard Feynman The Character of Physical Law (Lecture 6), > > >
