--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > There might be something to this article. For example, > > the English language refers to objects as male, female, > > or neuter. But never both. > > How about thinking shaping language? > > Like presenting three possibilities, and then > referring to the choices available as "both."
It's possible to start your own language using the attributes you want to include. But would it be useful to the real world? > > :-) >
