Message-ID: <igmgmb+s...@egroups.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="9-6643063290-8567304814=:3" X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 87.211.205.212 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose Sender: not...@yahoogroups.com X-Yahoo-GPoster: utgbvgqjv423z5x03beq
--9-6643063290-8567304814=:3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The same people trying to sue individuals for tens (sometimes hundreds) of thousands of dollars for downloading a few songs have no problem ripping off artists and infringing copyrights themselves. Everyone in the industry has known this for decades. Fortunately this time they got nailed for it in court to the tune of $45 million. BTW, in somewhat related news based on previous discussions here, just to compare to what you pay or have to put up with in the US, my ADSL service, which provides free phone calls anywhere, 20 Mbps Internet, and all HD or non-HD TV channels, costs me 30 Euros a month. All phones available in the Netherlands can be purchased "cracked" or "unlocked," meaning that you can choose any provider you want to for them. This includes iPhones, for which you can choose among 20 or more providers to find the best rate, or even use them on a pay-as-you-go basis, without a contract. On the other hand, and a *huge* contrast between here and France or Spain, there is no free TV in the Netherlands. None. No broadcast TV of any kind, analog or digital. In both France and Spain all you had to do was buy a decoder and you had access to dozens of digital channels via broadcast, many in HD. Here you have to pay someone -- some private company or another -- to get any TV channels at all. I'm not sure where this came from, but I'm a little dismayed that a country so progressive in many ways doesn't provide any free TV to its citizens. Record Labels To Pay $45 Million for Pirating Artists' Music Written by Ernesto <http://torrentfreak.com/author/ernesto/> on January 10, 2011 The major record labels are known for their harsh stance on copyright infringements, which in an ironic turn of events is now costing them millions of dollars. Revealing a double standard when it comes to `piracy', Warner Music, Sony BMG Music, EMI Music and Universal Music now have to pay Canadian artists $45 Million for the illegal use of thousands of tracks on compilation CDs. It is no secret that the major record labels have a double standard when it comes to copyright. On the one hand they try to put operators of BitTorrent sites in jail and ruin the lives of single mothers and students by demanding hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines, and on the other they sell CDs containing music for which they haven't always cleared the rights. This happens worldwide and more frequently than one would think. Over the years the labels have made a habit of using songs from a wide variety of artists for compilation CDs without securing the rights. They simply use the recording and make note of it on "pending list" so they can deal with it later. This has been going on since the 1980s and since then the list of unpaid tracks (or copyright infringements) has grown to 300,000 in Canada alone. This questionable practice has been the subject of an interesting Canadian class action lawsuit which was started in 2008. A group of artists and composers who grew tired of waiting endlessly for their money filed a lawsuit against four major labels connected to the CRIA, the local equivalent of the RIAA. Warner Music, Sony BMG Music, EMI Music and Universal Music were sued for the illegal use of thousands of tracks and risked paying damages of up to $6 billion. Today the news broke that the two parties have agreed upon a settlement, where the record labels are required to pay $45 million to settle <http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/5563/125/#comments> the copyright infringement claims. During the case the labels were painfully confronted with their own double standard when it comes to copyright infringement. "The conduct of the defendant record companies is aggravated by their strict and unremitting approach to the enforcement of their copyright interests against consumers," the artists argued in their initial claim for damages. Of course, the labels are not so quick to admit their wrongdoing and in their press release the settlement is described as a compromise. "The settlement is a compromise of disputed claims and is not an admission of liability or wrongdoing by the record labels," it reads <http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/January2011/10/c9214.html> . Yeah, right. :-) David Basskin, President and CEO of one of the major Canadian licensing collectives, was nonetheless happy with the outcome. "This agreement with the four major labels resolves all outstanding pending list claims. EMI, Sony, Universal and Warner are ensuring that the net result is more money for songwriters and music publishers. It's a win for everyone," he said. The major issues that led to this dispute are not resolved though. After paying off a small part of their debt the labels can continue to `pirate' artists' music as usual, using their work and placing the outstanding payments on a pending list for decades. A real solution would require the licensing system to change, and that's not likely to happen anytime soon. Exactly. And in the meantime they'll keep trying to prosecute individuals for "piracy." --9-6643063290-8567304814=:3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <i><font color=3D"#0000bf">The same people trying to sue individuals for te= ns (sometimes hundreds) of thousands of dollars for downloading a few songs= have no problem ripping off artists and infringing copyrights themselves. = Everyone in the industry has known this for decades. Fortunately this time = they got nailed for it in court to the tune of $45 million.<br><br>BTW, in = somewhat related news based on previous discussions here, just to compare t= o what you pay or have to put up with in the US, my ADSL service, which pro= vides free phone calls anywhere, 20 Mbps Internet, and all HD or non-HD TV = channels, costs me 30 Euros a month. All phones available in the Netherland= s can be purchased "cracked" or "unlocked," meaning that you can choose any= provider you want to for them. This includes iPhones, for which you can ch= oose among 20 or more providers to find the best rate, or even use them on = a pay-as-you-go basis, without a contract.<br><br>On the other hand, and a = *huge* contrast between here and France or Spain, there is no free TV in th= e Netherlands. None. No broadcast TV of any kind, analog or digital. In bot= h France and Spain all you had to do was buy a decoder and you had access t= o dozens of digital channels via broadcast, many in HD. Here you have to pa= y someone -- some private company or another -- to get any TV channels at a= ll. I'm not sure where this came from, but I'm a little dismayed that a cou= ntry so progressive in many ways doesn't provide any free TV to its citizen= s.<br></font></i><h2><b><font size=3D"3">Record Labels To Pay $45 Million f= or Pirating Artists' Music</font></b></h2> <span class=3D"post_credit">Written by <a href=3D"h= ttp://torrentfreak.com/author/ernesto/" title=3D"Posts by Ernesto">Ernesto<= /a> on January 10, 2011</span> <div class=3D"single-excerpt"> <p>The major record labels are known for their harsh stance on copyright infringements, which in an ironic turn of events is now costing them millions of dollars. Revealing a double standard when it comes to `piracy', Warner Music, Sony BMG Music, EMI Music and Universal Music now have to pay Canadian artists $45 Million for the illegal use of thousands of tracks on compilation CDs.</p> </div> <p>It is no secret that the major record labels have a double standard when it comes to copyright. On the one hand they try to put operators of BitTorrent sites in jail and ruin the lives of single mothers and students by demanding hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines, and on the other they sell CDs containing music for which they haven't always cleared the rights. This happens worldwide and more frequently than one would think.</p> <p>Over the years the labels have made a habit of using songs from a wide variety of artists for compilation CDs without securing the rights. They simply use the recording and make note of it on "pending list" so they can deal with it later. This has been going on since the 1980s and since then the list of unpaid tracks (or copyright infringements) has grown to 300,000 in Canada alone.</p> <p>This questionable practice has been the subject of an interesting Canadian class action lawsuit which was started in 2008. A group of artists and composers who grew tired of waiting endlessly for their money filed a lawsuit against four major labels connected to the CRIA, the local equivalent of the RIAA. </p> <p>Warner Music, Sony BMG Music, EMI Music and Universal Music were sued for the illegal use of thousands of tracks and risked paying damages of up to $6 billion. Today the news broke that the two parties have agreed upon a settlement, where the record labels are required to pay $45 million <a href=3D"http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/5563/125/#commen= ts">to settle</a> the copyright infringement claims.</p> <p>During the case the labels were painfully confronted with their own double standard when it comes to copyright infringement. "The conduct of the defendant record companies is aggravated by their strict and unremitting approach to the enforcement of their copyright interests against consumers," the artists argued in their initial claim for damages.</p> <p>Of course, the labels are not so quick to admit their wrongdoing and in their press release the settlement is described as a compromise. "The settlement is a compromise of disputed claims and is not an admission of liability or wrongdoing by the record labels," <a href=3D"http://www.new= swire.ca/en/releases/archive/January2011/10/c9214.html">it reads</a>.</p><p= ><i><font color=3D"#0000bf">Yeah, right. :-)</font></i><br></p> <p>David Basskin, President and CEO of one of the major Canadian licensing collectives, was nonetheless happy with the outcome. "This agreement with the four major labels resolves all outstanding pending list claims. EMI, Sony, Universal and Warner are ensuring that the net result is more money for songwriters and music publishers. It's a win for everyone," he said.</p> <p>The major issues that led to this dispute are not resolved though. After paying off a small part of their debt the labels can continue to `pirate' artists' music as usual, using their work and placing the outstanding payments on a pending list for decades. A real solution would require the licensing system to change, and that's not likely to happen anytime soon.</p><p><i><font color=3D"#0000bf">Exactly. And in the m= eantime they'll keep trying to prosecute individuals for "piracy."</font></= i><br></p><br> --9-6643063290-8567304814=:3--
