The banks cannot legally foreclose because they did not record title changes 
property. They have divided title using MERS as their "local county recording 
office". Your "servicer" (who you pay your mortgage to) is NOT the same as the 
owner of the note. Underneath that servicer, the notes are bundled and sold 
multiple times. In order to keep that more discrete, the banks use MERS to 
record the change in ownership. The homeowners are challenging the banks right 
to foreclose. The judges are state by state ruling in favor of the homeowner 
because what the banks did by avoiding proper change in title is lose their 
right to enforce the mortgages. When the banks foreclose they make back most of 
their money (at least 92%) which, in most cases is insured by fannie mae or 
mortgage insurance. When the foreclosure is done, banks go to fannie mae and 
say, "where's my money" If banks can't foreclose then they will lose all the 
money on the homes and as more homeowners are underwater they realize that the 
best business, financial decision is to walk or challenge the banks. This has 
snowballed and there is no way the banks can fix it now. They cannot go back 
and redo the title as that is akin to back dating a legal document.In Florida, 
in just one week, the banks dismissed (did not challenge) 1500 lawsuits against 
them. This week, a judge ruled against the main legal office doing foreclosures 
in Florida for flawed processes and told them that they could not foreclose or 
start over on the process. That legal office fired 568 employees the following 
day. If the banks can't get their money back from fannie mae, because they 
cannot foreclose, they will crash.

Here's a simple explanation
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-14/merscorp-has-no-right-to-transfer-mortgages-u-s-judge-says.html
MERS ruling in NY which is very significant being that the judge basically 
ruled the MERS is not a legal entity and has no rights. 

http://www.stopmyforeclosurehome.com/2011/02/new-yorks-us-bankruptcy-court-rules-merss-business-model-is-illegal.html

Reply via email to