No doubt. But it is also unlikely that rocks can KNOW and UNDERSTAND
their Primordial and Arcane existence,  and also unlikely that they love
like the I AM part of me in Eternity loves. It is also unlikely that
rocks can see. I AM can see.  And it is also unlikely that rocks have
that Perennial BASE Wisdom which we all have in that Ground of Being.
Best not judge it or scoff until you have known it. You CANNOT stay here
for ever, your time is limited here. Wait and see what comes.
Knowledge and understanding is NOT dependent on thinking. But thinking
can think about finding it and the go on the quest of finding it -
BEFORE curtain fall. Found it IS.

Know Thy SELF. Do not confuse it with the self.

Dick Richardson


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Yifu" <yifuxero@...> wrote:
>
> what happens...no thoughts? That's only temporary. But it's likely
rocks have no thoughts.
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "rwr" dick.richardson@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > IT HAPPENS. QED.
> >
> > rwr
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Yifu" <yifuxero@> wrote:
> > >
> > > contradicts MMY. You're saying "no possibility", but MMY's dogma
is
> > "infinite possibility", or "the field of all possibilities".
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "rwr" dick.richardson@
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Actually this is NOT a theory at all, it is a fact of experience
-
> > for
> > > > those who have known it. Knowledge, Innate Understanding, and
> > Vision,
> > > > yet no possibility to think. Thinking requires Time, but in the
> > domain
> > > > of the SELF time and change do not exist there. One can of
course
> > think
> > > > when one comes back here again - and one then has more to think
> > about :-
> > > > ) Not everybody calls it enlightenment however. I don't either,
and
> > > > never have since I found it one evening for three hours in 1964.
> > THAT
> > > > was a shock to be sure. But you get over the shock and then
> > Synthesise
> > > > it all. THAT is the hard bit. Well, for a while anyway. But it
> > comes.
> > > > Dick Richardson.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to