--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote:
>
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> >
> > http://www.manataka.org/page2423.html
> >
>
 
> 
> Yep it's true.  The first time or two I got kicked out of the domes it was 
> over facial hair.
> The first time I had a fat portfolio file that traveled the whole way up 
> through the TM-movement about it that came back down with the instruction, 
> that 'he should just be more simple'.   Little did they know the latest 
> research evidently.
> 
> -Buck
>


The first time I got kicked out of the domes it was over 'long' facial hair.  
The second time it was because the very trimmed 19th Century look was not 
considered 'trim' for the dome. 


Back in those days I had facial hair for theatrical prop.  I rode with cavalry 
groups that portrayed historical regiments.  My cavalry portrait look was on 
the cover of magazines and front pages of newspapers, so I had a portfolio 
growing then.  We were even getting hired as extras in movies.  I missed  "Ride 
with the Devil" the Ang Lee movie because I shaved my hussar's stash down to 
stay in the dome.  Cost me $3,500 in lost wages as an extra and some fame.  
Dang.

http://open.salon.com/blog/hal_m/2010/01/15/ang_lees_ride_with_the_devil_directors_cut_comes_to_blu
 

Doug Henning, he had long hair and his facial hair for theatrical reasons too 
but of course he was a somebody and got to be in the dome.  And, Maharishi?  
Purusha now are a bunch of hairy guys.  It's a look.  Us humans, it's all 
costuming.  Unless you understand the higher reasoning.  Those of us who do are 
a special tribe.

-Buck in FF

Reply via email to