--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "richardnelson108" <richardnelson108@...> 
wrote:
>
> Hey Vaj,
> I am NOT a TB.  And I have read Judith's book.
> TM works for me and I value what is has given me.  Thats all.  
> And what you don't seem to ever want to admit is that TM and MMY may have 
> some value for some people.  It seems like that possibility does not exist 
> for you.  One does not have to be a TB to gain the benefits of TM.  Millions 
> have
> I am not here, as I have repeatedly said, to defend MMY.  I am simply trying 
> to establish what is true and what is rumor.  
> 
> Now can someone tell me what the reference to Mahapatra is about?
> He is someone I have spent some time with, so I would like to know what he 
> "supposedly" said according to the Vaj man.  Then I can  weigh in on what he 
> directly told me. Thanks

Our posts crossed paths.  Would love to hear what Mahapatra told you.  There 
were a few posts maybe 3 years ago made here on FFL about Mahapatra's views of 
MMY.  Someone will be able to get you the numbers.  

> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > On May 26, 2011, at 8:32 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
> > 
> > > As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand sources who 
> > > acutally were in a position to know some of the details which were 
> > > alleged to have taken place.  Richard says he spoke directly with the 
> > > lawyer who handled SBS's will, and traveled to some of various places at 
> > > issue and spoke with people who were contempories of SBS, and M.  Vaj's 
> > > sources seem 2 or 3 steps removed from the events they are commenting on, 
> > > and are never identified in any detail.  Usually they are "a student of 
> > > so and so"
> > 
> > 
> > You're confusing tow very different sources.
> > 
> > And let's not mention that our Dear Richar N. sounds like a drooling TB. I 
> > mena, how many of those are actually left who are hip to the news?
> > 
> > HINT: Richard, read Bourque's expose on the "life-long celibate". Time to 
> > wake up the kids.
> >
>


Reply via email to