Discriminations and exclusions are acceptable for religious institutions, since many are privately funded. There is "wiggle" room in the definitions for exclusions.
MIU is not described as a "religious institution". However, who has the $$$ to challenge it anyway? Who even cares? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <wayback71@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ wrote: > > > > On Jun 16, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Rick Archer wrote: > > > > > You and I and others could offer our definitions, but what MUM means by this is that Amma is coming here in about a week, and they don't want anyone putting up posters, etc. Several people who had offered their support and who have been seeing her for years, have now withdrawn their support, although they will still see her, albeit with some degree of paranoia. > > > > > > Fairfield's own version of "being in the closet." > > > > Sal > > > Just wondering....is there anything illegal about denying access to programs based on this kind of rule? Could someone make a case about this? >
