"Several others seem to be able to contribute little more than "piling on" to demonize the posters who don't toe the TM Party Line, and call them uplifting names like donkeys."
That was me Barry. You are one to talk, with the vile and disgusting words you use against others.I called you and Vaj donkeys because I was trying to be polite and not call you jackasses, jackass. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > ...who had never practiced TM, and was here checking out > the scene and trying to figure out whether there was any > benefit for you in learning it, would you be favorably > impressed by the words and actions of those who act as > self-appointed "TM defenders" or "TM supporters" here? > > One, a newbie, seems to be dedicated to creating in other > people the least favorable opinion possible of a guy who > did nothing more than be honest about his TM experience > with a filmmaker. Another relative newb is on a campaign > to "out" anyone who posts here, so that he can know who > exactly they are and where they live; one can only wonder > why he wants to know this, and what plans he has for the > heretics once he has learned this information. Several > others seem to be able to contribute little more than > "piling on" to demonize the posters who don't toe the > TM Party Line, and call them uplifting names like donkeys. > > That's pretty much the "side" representing TM, and all > that it has done for the TMers in question, who have now > been practicing it for many years or decades. > > On the other "side," consider the simple post made by > one of the people these "TM supporters" have been trying > to demonize lately. Mark Landau made an honest and forth- > right post, containing no antagonism and stooping to > no name-calling, expressing more positive sentiments > about Maharishi than all of the folks I mention above > have made in all of their cumulative posts to FFL. > > If I were a lurker, I'd be looking at "What you focus > on you become." It seems to me that on the whole those > who have appointed themselves as "TM defenders" can't > seem to do anything but "defend." They seem incapable > of saying anything positive about that which they are > defending, only negative things about those who they > feel are "against" it. Meanwhile, one of the people > they are trying diligently to demonize *was* able to > post positive things about Maharishi and TM. Go figure. > > If I were a lurker, I sure know which I'd be more > impressed by. >
