"So it was the believer's confidence in their ability to plumb his soul
what I was comparing, not his deeds or pathological mass murdering
mindset."
Who are these believers? Innocent, gullible, feudal mindset of 1940's
Chinese vs  free spirited anti-establishment 60's Americans?


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<curtisdeltablues@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi" raviyogi@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thanks Curtis - some of us never had cultish mindset like you guys
and don't have to carry this burden for rest of our lives.
>
> I'm not too sure about that.  People influenced by this mindset are
notoriously bad at recognizing it in themselves.  There is a natural
tendency to believe that we are too smart for that.
>
>
> < To compare M with Mao is sick and twisted.>
>
> I hope you take the time to re-read to get the point you obviously
missed.  I was comparing the confidence his followers had in their
subjective evaluation of him with that same confidence in guru
followers.  It is a good example because of the numbers involved and the
way followers talked about him. Have you read about Mao from the
perspective of people who knew him?  But we can all agree that he was
probably not God on earth, and that makes my point.  Millions and
millions of people experienced him as God. They were absolutely sure of
it and many gave their lives for that belief.  And by many I mean more
millions of people than anyone in the history of the world killed with
the possible exception of Stalin.  And here Hitler has all the History
Chanel specials, what's up with that?
>
> So it was the believer's confidence in their ability to plumb his soul
what I was comparing, not his deeds or pathological mass murdering
mindset.
>
> Although your assessment of me as sick and twisted is spot on, this is
not one of the many possible examples that would prove this.
>
>


Reply via email to