* * * Good question. The 2D Yin-Yang dynamically reminds me very much of a 4D Klein Bottle, which in turn appears not all that unlike the 3D Torus, albeit a bit less symmetrical...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@...> wrote: > > I was imagining (imaging?) it after you described it, and wondering when we > see it as a 2D representation, what it looks like as a 3D model, what is > going on from the side, or in the back. Would be a cool thing to render in > AutoCAD. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" <rorygoff@> wrote: > > > > Ha! Yeah, precisely that, Jim! :-) > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> wrote: > > > > > > Nice description - like that Yin Yang Symbol thingie! :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" <rorygoff@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Ah, outward stroke! So perhaps we can see our white-hole (inner > > > > destroyer, outer creator) as our simple thought-pattern/Pater > > > > impressing on our external golden equator (outward half of Soul/Sol, > > > > light-consciousness aware of itself: outer "creation") and then > > > > flipping as action into black-hole matter/Mater (outer destroyer, inner > > > > creator) to collapse into our central singularity-point (inward half of > > > > Soul/Sol light-consciousness: inner I AM particle or "creature") which > > > > thus experiences the action-reaction incarnate effect of our own > > > > thought...a beautiful feedback mechanism. > > > > > > > > From the inside, Love-Being is the black-hole, Consciousness is the I > > > > AM golden light-singularity or Solar furnace, and Active Bliss is the > > > > white-hole; from the outside, Love-Being is the white-hole, > > > > Consciousness is the THAT ALONE IS golden light-disc or light-equator, > > > > and Active Bliss the black-hole. The destruction of the inner is the > > > > creation of the outer, and vice versa: Each viewpoint "negates" and > > > > complements the other. > > > > > > > > *L*L*L* > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Inward stroke dude. Same deal. Was talking about the outward one. All > > > > > good, Over and out there.:-) > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" <rorygoff@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > * * Could be, Jim! I like to see it psychologically as Energy > > > > > > (Bliss or Spirit) is Mass (gravity-Love or Body) times > > > > > > Consciousness or Awareness (Soul) squared, or Aware of ItSelf: that > > > > > > is, we digest a Solid "other" into our Solar, Soular I AM furnace > > > > > > by knowing it through Love as our Self, thereby converting it into > > > > > > pure Energy or Bliss -- HA! :-D > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if we take the C squared as a constant, and assume it to be > > > > > > > Unlimited or Pure Consciousness*, the E = MC squared equation is > > > > > > > then rendered as Energy, or Thought, Equals Mass times > > > > > > > Consciousness squared, or Action reflecting Pure Consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next, writing the equation with Pure Consciousness closer to > > > > > > > Thought, it becomes, Thought Supported By Pure Consciousness > > > > > > > Equals Action, [T/C = A], or Yogastah Kuru Karmani. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * It should be noted that Pure Consciousness is an approximation > > > > > > > in the equation, using the vast possibilities inherent in the > > > > > > > value of Consciousness squared, to approximate Pure > > > > > > > Consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" <rorygoff@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mark Landau <m@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Constant, a particular constant, the speed of light. But you > > > > > > > > > knew that, right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * Constant-- beautiful, Mark! No, I really know nothing. > > > > > > > > But yes, within the body of manifestation there may be one > > > > > > > > relative Constant, the light-awareness of I AM, ever balancing > > > > > > > > between creation and destruction :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Landau <m@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > >I may not get that far, but I keep thinking I should rework > > > > > > > > >your torus a little. My guess is it could be reworked in a > > > > > > > > >lot of ways. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * You're probably right! Being pretty close to fundamental, > > > > > > > > it must find many, many ways to rework itself to express > > > > > > > > apparent differentiation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
